07.08.2013 Views

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

Unfitness to Plead Consultation Responses - Law Commission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Provisional Proposal 2<br />

Sense agrees with this approach.<br />

Provisional Proposal 3<br />

Sense agrees with this approach.<br />

Provisional Proposal 4<br />

Sense agrees with the approach put forward in the consultation paper. A<br />

deafblind person *may have sufficient communication and access <strong>to</strong> information<br />

ability <strong>to</strong> follow simple proceedings, for example for a crime where the act had<br />

been caught on a CCTV camera and the main issue was of identification of the<br />

accused. However if the proceedings were more complex and involved complex<br />

language and evidence then it may be that the same individual would encounter<br />

substantial problems in accessing the trial.<br />

At Paragraph 4.15 the Government gives seven recommendations which it would<br />

endorse. The third recommendation relates <strong>to</strong> the need for improved systems for<br />

screening and assessing defendants needs. Sense agrees with this<br />

recommendation and would like <strong>to</strong> specifically highlight the need for a specialist<br />

assessment carried out by suitably qualified person <strong>to</strong> determine the needs of the<br />

defendant. The uniqueness of deafblindness as a disability has been recognised<br />

by the government in statu<strong>to</strong>ry guidance issued under Section 7 Local Authority<br />

Social Services Act 1970. 5 The Guidance sets out the need for specialist<br />

assessments carried out by a suitably qualified person. Sense highly<br />

recommends that the same approach is taken in the context of assessing<br />

defendants needs. 6<br />

Provisional Proposal 5<br />

Sense agrees that the availability of special measures which would aid the<br />

decision-making capacity of the individual or the ability <strong>to</strong> access the court<br />

proceedings should be considered when the court is assessing an individual’s<br />

decision-making capacity and their fitness <strong>to</strong> plea or stand trial.<br />

Sense firmly believes that in the interests of equality a deafblind person should<br />

not be able <strong>to</strong> hide behind his or her disability. If the individual has the capacity <strong>to</strong><br />

access the trial proceedings then he or she should be considered fit <strong>to</strong> plead. If<br />

adjustments are required <strong>to</strong> allow the deafblind person <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> access the<br />

trial then providing those adjustments are made <strong>to</strong> an adequate and appropriate<br />

standard (and where applicable) by a person suitably qualified <strong>to</strong> make the<br />

adjustments, then the deafblind person should be considered <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> plea and<br />

stand trial.<br />

5<br />

Social care for deafblind children and adults LAC(DH)(2009)6<br />

6<br />

See below at page 10<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!