10.08.2013 Views

Guide to measuring information and ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Guide to measuring information and ... - unesdoc - Unesco

Guide to measuring information and ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ED50 Promotion rate of learners in grades not receiving ICT-assisted instruction (by gender, by type of institution<br />

<strong>and</strong> by grade) (for ISCED levels 1-3)<br />

Definition:<br />

Percentage of learners enrolled only in grades with NO ICTassisted<br />

instruction during the last academic year who were<br />

promoted <strong>to</strong> the next higher grade for ISCED levels 1-3.<br />

Data requirement:<br />

(LPI) Number of learners promoted only from previous grades<br />

with ICT-assisted instruction at the end of the last academic<br />

year (t-1) (by gender, by type of institution <strong>and</strong> by grade) for<br />

ISCED levels 1-3.<br />

(refer <strong>to</strong> questionnaire item E.4.1)<br />

(LEI) Number of learners enrolled only in grades with ICTassisted<br />

instruction during the last academic year (by gender,<br />

by type of institution <strong>and</strong> by grade) for ISCED levels 1-3.<br />

(refer <strong>to</strong> questionnaire item E.3.1)<br />

(LP) Number of learners promoted from the previous grades at<br />

the end of the last academic year (t-1) (by gender, by type of<br />

institution <strong>and</strong> by grade) for ISCED levels 1-3.<br />

(refer <strong>to</strong> questionnaire item E.4)<br />

(L) Number of learners enrolled during the last academic year<br />

(by gender, by type of institution <strong>and</strong> by grade) for ISCED<br />

levels 1-3.<br />

(refer <strong>to</strong> questionnaire item E.3)<br />

Formula:<br />

LP<br />

L<br />

t<br />

g<br />

<br />

LPI<br />

t 1<br />

g 1 LEI<br />

t<br />

g<br />

t 1<br />

g 1<br />

* 100<br />

- 82 -<br />

Purpose:<br />

To measure the promotion rate of learners enrolled in grades<br />

where ICT are not used as a pedagogical aid.<br />

Method of collection:<br />

Administrative data collection through annual school census<br />

(or extract data from school records).<br />

Data source(s):<br />

Statistical units of the ministries of education or, alternatively,<br />

national statistical offices.<br />

Where:<br />

LPI t<br />

g = Number of learners enrolled only in grade g-1 with ICT-assisted instruction during the last academic year who were<br />

promoted <strong>to</strong> the next grade g (by gender <strong>and</strong> type of institution) in school-year t<br />

LEI t1<br />

g<br />

1 = Number of learners enrolled only in grades g-1 with ICT-assisted instruction during the last academic year (by<br />

gender <strong>and</strong> type of institution) in school-year t-1<br />

LP t<br />

g = Number of learners enrolled during the last academic year in grade g-1 who were promoted <strong>to</strong> the next grade g (by<br />

gender <strong>and</strong> type of institution) in school-year t<br />

L t1<br />

g<br />

1 = Number of learners enrolled during the last academic year (by gender <strong>and</strong> type of institution) in grades g-1 in<br />

school-year t-1<br />

Analysis <strong>and</strong> interpretation:<br />

A high promotion rate implies a high proportion of learners<br />

successfully passing from a lower grade <strong>to</strong> a higher grade.<br />

By comparing the promotion rate of learners who enrolled in<br />

grades without ICT-assisted instruction with those who attended<br />

the same grades with ICT-assisted instruction, one can verify if<br />

there are differences. If so, further investigation, using testing<br />

methods, may be needed <strong>to</strong> determine the degree <strong>to</strong> which<br />

these differences can be attributed <strong>to</strong> the impact of ICT on<br />

teaching <strong>and</strong> learning.<br />

Methodological <strong>and</strong> definition issues or operational<br />

limitations:<br />

One must be cautious not <strong>to</strong> attribute low promotion rates<br />

solely <strong>to</strong> the non-use of ICT in teaching <strong>and</strong> learning, as there<br />

are other fac<strong>to</strong>rs contributing <strong>to</strong> successful passage from one<br />

grade <strong>to</strong> another.<br />

In countries where learners are au<strong>to</strong>matically promoted <strong>to</strong> the<br />

next grade for ISCED levels 1-3 or in terminal grades where a<br />

quota system may directly or indirectly affect promotion rates,<br />

this indica<strong>to</strong>r becomes meaningless.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!