A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

188 Appendix 10 TABLE 107 Variation 4: TNF inhibitors third (early RA values) (100,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 48,100 97 5.2549 0.0131 Etan 60,598 117 5.5899 0.0135 Adal+MTX 48,344 98 5.4002 0.0129 Etan+MTX 60,707 118 5.6922 0.0135 Infl+MTX 47,877 93 5.3595 0.0130 Base 16,461 23 4.6139 0.0125 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 31,639 95 0.6409 0.0136 Etan – Base 44,137 114 0.9759 0.0141 Ad+M – Base 31,883 96 0.7863 0.0136 Et+M – Base 44,246 115 1.0782 0.0142 In+M – Base 31,415 91 0.7455 0.0135 Ad+M – Adal 244 130 0.1454 0.0141 Et+M – Etan 109 153 0.1023 0.0150 Etan – Adal 12,498 142 0.3350 0.0145 Et+M – Ad+M 12,363 142 0.2919 0.0145 Ad+M – In+M 467 127 0.0408 0.0140 Et+M – In+M 12,831 141 0.3327 0.0145 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 49,400 47,300 to 51,600 Etan – Base 45,200 43,900 to 46,600 Ad+M – Base 40,500 39,200 to 42,000 Et+M – Base 41,000 40,000 to 42,200 In+M – Base 42,100 40,600 to 43,700 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Etan+MTX more effective than Etan alone; diff. cost not significant Etan – Adal 37,300 34,200 to 41,000 Et+M – Ad+M 42,400 38,400 to 47,200 Ad+M – In+M 11,500 6,110 to 92,700 Et+M – In+M 38,600 35,400 to 42,400 TABLE 108 Variation 4: TNF inhibitors third (late RA values) (200,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 47,417 68 4.5550 0.0092 Etan 59,961 83 5.0714 0.0094 Adal+MTX 47,781 69 4.8287 0.0091 Etan+MTX 60,035 83 5.0689 0.0095 Infl+MTX 47,068 66 4.5821 0.0092 Base 16,382 16 4.6147 0.0088 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 31,034 67 –0.0596 0.0093 Etan – Base 43,579 80 0.4568 0.0097 Ad+M – Base 31,399 67 0.2141 0.0093 Et+M – Base 43,652 81 0.4542 0.0097 In+M – Base 30,686 64 –0.0325 0.0093 Ad+M – Adal 364 90 0.2737 0.0093 Et+M – Etan 73 107 –0.0025 0.0101 Etan – Adal 12,545 99 0.5164 0.0097 Et+M – Ad+M 12,254 100 0.2402 0.0098 In+M – Ad+M 713 89 0.2466 0.0094 Et+M – In+M 12,967 98 0.4867 0.0098 continued
TABLE 108 Variation 4: TNF inhibitors third (late RA values) (200,000 patients) (cont’d) © Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base Base dominates Adal Etan – Base 95,400 91,500 to 99,600 Ad+M – Base 147,000 135,000 to 161,000 Et+M – Base 96,100 92,100 to 100,000 In+M – Base Base dominates Infl+MTX Ad+M – Adal 1,330 665 to 2,000 Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 24,300 23,300 to 25,300 Et+M – Ad+M 51,000 47,100 to 55,700 In+M – Ad+M 2,890 2,140 to 3,640 Et+M – In+M 26,600 25,500 to 27,800 TABLE 109 Variation 4: TNF inhibitors last (20,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 35,868 213 1.0425 0.0190 Etan 48,695 259 1.9916 0.0222 Adal+MTX 36,319 215 1.3258 0.0191 Etan+MTX 48,859 259 2.0122 0.0229 Infl+MTX 35,780 206 1.0933 0.0194 Base 2,833 11 0.4757 0.0166 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 33,035 211 0.5668 0.0142 Etan – Base 45,863 256 1.5159 0.0195 Ad+M – Base 33,486 213 0.8501 0.0149 Et+M – Base 46,027 256 1.5365 0.0203 In+M – Base 32,947 204 0.6176 0.0149 Ad+M – Adal 451 291 0.2834 0.0179 Et+M – Etan 164 339 0.0206 0.0258 Etan – Adal 12,827 321 0.9492 0.0217 Et+M – Ad+M 12,541 320 0.6864 0.0231 Ad+M – In+M 539 287 0.2325 0.0186 Et+M – In+M 13,080 316 0.9189 0.0231 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 58,300 55,400 to 61,500 Etan – Base 30,300 29,400 to 31,100 Ad+M – Base 39,400 38,000 to 40,900 Et+M – Base 30,000 29,100 to 30,800 In+M – Base 53,300 50,800 to 56,100 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 13,500 12,600 to 14,400 Et+M – Ad+M 18,300 16,800 to 20,000 Ad+M – In+M Adal+MTX more effective than Infl+MTX; diff. cost not significant Et+M – In+M 14,200 13,300 to 15,300 189
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 3 and 4:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 5 and 6:
Objectives: This report reviews the
Page 7:
Glossary and list of abbreviations
Page 10 and 11:
viii Glossary and list of abbreviat
Page 13 and 14:
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA
Page 15:
increased risk of serious infection
Page 19 and 20:
Summary RA is a common, chronic, in
Page 21 and 22:
(IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pr
Page 23 and 24:
Assessment of response to DMARDs Re
Page 25 and 26:
combination with methotrexate or al
Page 27:
disease between clinic appointments
Page 30 and 31:
14 Effectiveness in juvenile arthri
Page 32 and 33:
16 Effectiveness adalimumab plus me
Page 34 and 35:
18 Effectiveness Monoclonal Antibod
Page 36 and 37:
20 TABLE 1 Description of included
Page 38 and 39:
22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
Page 40 and 41:
24 Effectiveness change in modified
Page 42 and 43:
26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
Page 44 and 45:
28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 46 and 47:
30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 48 and 49:
32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 50 and 51:
34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 52 and 53:
36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
Page 54 and 55:
38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
Page 56 and 57:
40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
Page 58 and 59:
42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
Page 72 and 73:
56 TABLE 12 Description of included
Page 74 and 75:
58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
Page 76 and 77:
60 Effectiveness per week and escal
Page 78 and 79:
62 Effectiveness significant advant
Page 80 and 81:
64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 82 and 83:
66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 84 and 85:
68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
Page 86 and 87:
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary o
Page 89 and 90:
Summary of review of existing econo
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
Page 97 and 98:
TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
Page 99 and 100:
management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
Page 101 and 102:
To estimate the long-term consequen
Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
Page 107 and 108:
een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
Page 115 and 116:
TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
Page 117 and 118:
following properties, according to
Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 121 and 122:
TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 123 and 124:
TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
Page 125 and 126:
TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 129:
The substantial economic impact of
Page 133 and 134:
Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
Page 135 and 136:
inhibitors, although the incrementa
Page 137 and 138:
introduce bias which generally exag
Page 139:
Adalimumab, etanercept and inflixim
Page 143 and 144:
1. Jobanputra P, Barton P, Bryan S,
Page 145 and 146:
46. Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies
Page 147 and 148:
tumor necrosis factor therapy in th
Page 149 and 150:
arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind,
Page 151 and 152:
171. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson
Page 153 and 154: 216. Schotte H, Willeke P, Mickholz
Page 155 and 156: The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Page 157 and 158: Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) 2005 Iss
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 3 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 161: TABLE 69 Studies excluded from clin
Page 164 and 165: 148 Appendix 4 TABLE 71 Meta-analys
Page 166 and 167: 150 Appendix 4 TABLE 73 Meta-analys
Page 168 and 169: 152 Appendix 4 Infliximab versus pl
Page 170 and 171: 154 Appendix 4 Infliximab plus MTX
Page 173: Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1966 to February we
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 8 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 179 and 180: TABLE 79 Wong et al., 2002 161 © Q
Page 181 and 182: TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 (c
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 82 Brennan et al., 2004 160
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 83 Kobelt et al., 2004 163 (c
Page 187 and 188: TABLE 85 Bansback et al., 2005 166
Page 189: TABLE 86 Kobelt et al., 2005 167 (c
Page 192 and 193: 176 Appendix 9 TABLE 89 Strategy se
Page 195 and 196: Extensive sensitivity analysis was
Page 197 and 198: TABLE 96 Variation 1: TNF inhibitor
Page 199 and 200: TABLE 99 Variation 2: TNF inhibitor
Page 201 and 202: TABLE 102 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 203: TABLE 105 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 132 Variation 10: TNF inhibit
Page 243: TABLE 165 Variation 18: TNF inhibit
Page 247 and 248: Volume 1, 1997 No. 1 Home parentera
Page 249 and 250: No. 3 Screening for sickle cell dis
Page 251 and 252: No. 25 A rapid and systematic revie
Page 253 and 254: No. 11 First and second trimester a
Page 255 and 256:
No. 23 Clinical effectiveness and c
Page 257 and 258:
No. 28 Outcomes of electrically sti
Page 259:
No. 28 Adefovir dipivoxil and pegyl
Page 262 and 263:
246 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 264:
248 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?