A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

196 Appendix 10 TABLE 119 Variation 7: TNF inhibitors third (early RA values) (20,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 48,650 222 5.4799 0.0317 Etan 61,379 267 6.2553 0.0344 Adal+MTX 48,423 221 5.6541 0.0319 Etan+MTX 61,220 267 6.2992 0.0345 Infl+MTX 48,015 212 5.5708 0.0316 Base 16,317 52 4.2654 0.0289 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 32,334 216 1.2145 0.0287 Etan – Base 45,063 260 1.9899 0.0320 Ad+M – Base 32,107 216 1.3887 0.0289 Et+M – Base 44,904 259 2.0338 0.0320 In+M – Base 31,699 207 1.3054 0.0288 Adal – Ad+M 227 294 –0.1742 0.0316 Etan – Et+M 159 350 –0.0438 0.0365 Etan – Adal 12,729 323 0.7754 0.0341 Et+M – Ad+M 12,797 325 0.6451 0.0343 Ad+M – In+M 408 289 0.0833 0.0316 Et+M – In+M 13,205 319 0.7284 0.0342 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 26,600 25,400 to 28,000 Etan – Base 22,600 21,900 to 23,400 Ad+M – Base 23,100 22,200 to 24,200 Et+M – Base 22,100 21,400 to 22,800 In+M – Base 24,300 23,200 to 25,500 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 16,400 14,900 to 18,300 Et+M – Ad+M 19,800 17,700 to 22,500 Ad+M – In+M Adal+MTX more effective than Infl+MTX; diff. cost not significant Et+M – In+M 18,100 16,400 to 20,300 TABLE 120 Variation 7: TNF inhibitors third (late RA values) (40,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 47,660 155 4.8371 0.0221 Etan 60,622 189 5.7193 0.0239 Adal+MTX 48,035 155 5.0840 0.0221 Etan+MTX 60,555 189 5.6993 0.0241 Infl+MTX 47,352 149 4.8462 0.0223 Base 16,295 36 4.3003 0.0206 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 31,365 151 0.5367 0.0188 Etan – Base 44,327 183 1.4190 0.0213 Ad+M – Base 31,740 152 0.7837 0.0193 Et+M – Base 44,260 183 1.3990 0.0216 In+M – Base 31,058 145 0.5459 0.0190 Ad+M – Adal 375 205 0.2470 0.0198 Etan – Et+M 67 244 0.0200 0.0239 Etan – Adal 12,962 227 0.8823 0.0218 Et+M – Ad+M 12,520 227 0.6153 0.0223 Ad+M – In+M 682 202 0.2378 0.0202 Et+M – In+M 13,203 223 0.8531 0.0222 continued
TABLE 120 Variation 7: TNF inhibitors third (late RA values) (40,000 patients) (cont’d) © Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 58,400 54,600 to 62,900 Etan – Base 31,200 30,300 to 32,200 Ad+M – Base 40,500 38,600 to 42,600 Et+M – Base 31,600 30,700 to 32,700 In+M – Base 56,900 53,200 to 61,200 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 14,700 13,900 to 15,600 Et+M – Ad+M 20,300 18,800 to 22,100 Ad+M – In+M 2,870 1,100 to 4,640 Et+M – In+M 15,500 14,600 to 16,500 TABLE 121 Variation 7: TNF inhibitors last (20,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 36,804 218 1.9159 0.0224 Etan 49,802 263 3.0181 0.0269 Adal+MTX 37,244 220 2.2088 0.0229 Etan+MTX 49,641 264 3.0262 0.0274 Infl+MTX 36,534 208 1.9573 0.0229 Base 2,900 11 1.0582 0.0184 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 33,904 216 0.8577 0.0162 Etan – Base 46,902 260 1.9599 0.0227 Ad+M – Base 34,344 218 1.1506 0.0175 Et+M – Base 46,741 261 1.9680 0.0236 In+M – Base 33,634 206 0.8990 0.0171 Ad+M – Adal 440 299 0.2929 0.0209 Etan – Et+M 161 348 –0.0081 0.0301 Etan – Adal 12,998 324 1.1022 0.0251 Et+M – Ad+M 12,397 328 0.8174 0.0267 Ad+M – In+M 710 293 0.2515 0.0215 Et+M – In+M 13,107 320 1.0689 0.0266 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 39,500 38,000 to 41,200 Etan – Base 23,900 23,300 to 24,600 Ad+M – Base 29,800 28,900 to 30,900 Et+M – Base 23,800 23,100 to 24,400 In+M – Base 37,400 36,000 to 39,000 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Etan – Et+M Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 11,800 11,000 to 12,600 Et+M – Ad+M 15,200 14,000 to 16,600 Ad+M – In+M 2,820 442 to 5,200 Et+M – In+M 12,300 11,500 to 13,200 197
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 3 and 4:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 5 and 6:
Objectives: This report reviews the
Page 7:
Glossary and list of abbreviations
Page 10 and 11:
viii Glossary and list of abbreviat
Page 13 and 14:
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA
Page 15:
increased risk of serious infection
Page 19 and 20:
Summary RA is a common, chronic, in
Page 21 and 22:
(IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pr
Page 23 and 24:
Assessment of response to DMARDs Re
Page 25 and 26:
combination with methotrexate or al
Page 27:
disease between clinic appointments
Page 30 and 31:
14 Effectiveness in juvenile arthri
Page 32 and 33:
16 Effectiveness adalimumab plus me
Page 34 and 35:
18 Effectiveness Monoclonal Antibod
Page 36 and 37:
20 TABLE 1 Description of included
Page 38 and 39:
22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
Page 40 and 41:
24 Effectiveness change in modified
Page 42 and 43:
26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
Page 44 and 45:
28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 46 and 47:
30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 48 and 49:
32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 50 and 51:
34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 52 and 53:
36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
Page 54 and 55:
38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
Page 56 and 57:
40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
Page 58 and 59:
42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
Page 72 and 73:
56 TABLE 12 Description of included
Page 74 and 75:
58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
Page 76 and 77:
60 Effectiveness per week and escal
Page 78 and 79:
62 Effectiveness significant advant
Page 80 and 81:
64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 82 and 83:
66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 84 and 85:
68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
Page 86 and 87:
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary o
Page 89 and 90:
Summary of review of existing econo
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
Page 97 and 98:
TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
Page 99 and 100:
management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
Page 101 and 102:
To estimate the long-term consequen
Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
Page 107 and 108:
een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
Page 115 and 116:
TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
Page 117 and 118:
following properties, according to
Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 121 and 122:
TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 123 and 124:
TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
Page 125 and 126:
TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 129:
The substantial economic impact of
Page 133 and 134:
Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
Page 135 and 136:
inhibitors, although the incrementa
Page 137 and 138:
introduce bias which generally exag
Page 139:
Adalimumab, etanercept and inflixim
Page 143 and 144:
1. Jobanputra P, Barton P, Bryan S,
Page 145 and 146:
46. Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies
Page 147 and 148:
tumor necrosis factor therapy in th
Page 149 and 150:
arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind,
Page 151 and 152:
171. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson
Page 153 and 154:
216. Schotte H, Willeke P, Mickholz
Page 155 and 156:
The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Page 157 and 158:
Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) 2005 Iss
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 3 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 161: TABLE 69 Studies excluded from clin
Page 164 and 165: 148 Appendix 4 TABLE 71 Meta-analys
Page 166 and 167: 150 Appendix 4 TABLE 73 Meta-analys
Page 168 and 169: 152 Appendix 4 Infliximab versus pl
Page 170 and 171: 154 Appendix 4 Infliximab plus MTX
Page 173: Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1966 to February we
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 8 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 179 and 180: TABLE 79 Wong et al., 2002 161 © Q
Page 181 and 182: TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 (c
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 82 Brennan et al., 2004 160
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 83 Kobelt et al., 2004 163 (c
Page 187 and 188: TABLE 85 Bansback et al., 2005 166
Page 189: TABLE 86 Kobelt et al., 2005 167 (c
Page 192 and 193: 176 Appendix 9 TABLE 89 Strategy se
Page 195 and 196: Extensive sensitivity analysis was
Page 197 and 198: TABLE 96 Variation 1: TNF inhibitor
Page 199 and 200: TABLE 99 Variation 2: TNF inhibitor
Page 201 and 202: TABLE 102 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 211: TABLE 117 Variation 6: TNF inhibito
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 132 Variation 10: TNF inhibit
Page 243: TABLE 165 Variation 18: TNF inhibit
Page 247 and 248: Volume 1, 1997 No. 1 Home parentera
Page 249 and 250: No. 3 Screening for sickle cell dis
Page 251 and 252: No. 25 A rapid and systematic revie
Page 253 and 254: No. 11 First and second trimester a
Page 255 and 256: No. 23 Clinical effectiveness and c
Page 257 and 258: No. 28 Outcomes of electrically sti
Page 259: No. 28 Adefovir dipivoxil and pegyl
Page 262 and 263:
246 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 264:
248 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?