A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

200 Appendix 10 TABLE 125 Variation 8: TNF inhibitors last (20,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 36,186 215 1.8335 0.0220 Etan 49,049 262 2.9338 0.0268 Adal+MTX 36,117 215 2.1086 0.0223 Etan+MTX 49,070 263 2.9087 0.0271 Infl+MTX 35,434 205 1.8284 0.0221 Base 2,812 11 0.9754 0.0180 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 33,374 213 0.8581 0.0159 Etan – Base 46,237 259 1.9584 0.0227 Ad+M – Base 33,305 213 1.1332 0.0171 Et+M – Base 46,258 260 1.9333 0.0233 In+M – Base 32,622 203 0.8530 0.0164 Adal – Ad+M 69 292 –0.2751 0.0205 Et+M – Etan 21 343 –0.0251 0.0297 Etan – Adal 12,863 320 1.1003 0.0250 Et+M – Ad+M 12,953 323 0.8002 0.0264 Ad+M – In+M 683 286 0.2802 0.0210 Et+M – In+M 13,636 317 1.0804 0.0260 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 38,900 37,400 to 40,500 Etan – Base 23,600 23,000 to 24,200 Ad+M – Base 29,400 28,500 to 30,400 Et+M – Base 23,900 23,300 to 24,600 In+M – Base 38,200 36,800 to 39,900 Adal – Ad+M Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 11,700 10,900 to 12,500 Et+M – Ad+M 16,200 15,000 to 17,600 Ad+M – In+M 2,440 364 to 4,510 Et+M – In+M 12,600 11,800 to 13,500 Variation 9 For this variation, survival times on conventional DMARDs were reduced by 50%. TABLE 126 Variation 9: TNF inhibitors first (40,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 49,448 160 8.3841 0.0254 Etan 63,898 194 8.8538 0.0267 Adal+MTX 49,982 163 7.8754 0.0241 Etan+MTX 63,770 197 8.4103 0.0259 Infl+MTX 48,828 154 7.6905 0.0240 Base 15,589 32 7.5443 0.0235 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 33,859 157 0.8398 0.0254 Etan – Base 48,309 190 1.3095 0.0266 Ad+M – Base 34,393 161 0.3311 0.0247 Et+M – Base 48,181 192 0.8660 0.0260 In+M – Base 33,239 152 0.1462 0.0246 Ad+M – Adal 533 219 –0.5087 0.0256 Etan – Et+M 127 261 0.4435 0.0276 continued
TABLE 126 Variation 9: TNF inhibitors first (40,000 patients) (cont’d) © Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 Etan – Adal 14,449 241 0.4697 0.0270 Et+M – Ad+M 13,789 244 0.5349 0.0261 Ad+M – In+M 1,154 217 0.1849 0.0248 Et+M – In+M 14,943 237 0.7198 0.0262 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 40,300 38,000 to 42,900 Etan – Base 36,900 35,400 to 38,500 Ad+M – Base 104,000 90,400 to 122,000 Et+M – Base 55,600 52,500 to 59,200 In+M – Base 227,000 170,000 to 343,000 Ad+M – Adal Adal alone dominates Adal+MTX Etan – Et+M Etan+MTX more effective than Etan alone; diff. cost not significant Etan – Adal 30,800 27,500 to 34,900 Et+M – Ad+M 25,800 23,400 to 28,800 Ad+M – In+M 6,240 3,350 to 9,130 Et+M – In+M 20,800 19,200 to 22,600 TABLE 127 Variation 9: TNF inhibitors third (early RA values) (40,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 48,652 157 5.9790 0.0225 Etan 61,597 190 6.6380 0.0245 Adal+MTX 48,533 157 6.1027 0.0225 Etan+MTX 61,625 191 6.7264 0.0245 Infl+MTX 48,384 150 6.0913 0.0225 Base 15,954 32 4.8044 0.0202 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 32,698 155 1.1746 0.0211 Etan – Base 45,643 185 1.8336 0.0231 Ad+M – Base 32,580 155 1.2983 0.0212 Et+M – Base 45,671 187 1.9220 0.0234 In+M – Base 32,430 148 1.2869 0.0212 Adal – Ad+M 118 211 –0.1237 0.0230 Et+M – Etan 27 249 0.0884 0.0263 Etan – Adal 12,945 232 0.6590 0.0246 Et+M – Ad+M 13,091 232 0.6238 0.0248 Ad+M – In+M 150 207 0.0114 0.0229 Et+M – In+M 13,241 229 0.6351 0.0248 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 27,800 26,800 to 28,900 Etan – Base 24,900 24,300 to 25,600 Ad+M – Base 25,100 24,300 to 26,000 Et+M – Base 23,800 23,200 to 24,400 In+M – Base 25,200 24,400 to 26,100 Adal – Ad+M Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Etan+MTX more effective than Etan alone; diff. cost not significant Etan – Adal 19,600 18,100 to 21,400 Et+M – Ad+M 21,000 19,300 to 23,000 Ad+M – In+M Comparison is inconclusive Et+M – In+M 20,800 19,200 to 22,800 201
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 3 and 4:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 5 and 6:
Objectives: This report reviews the
Page 7:
Glossary and list of abbreviations
Page 10 and 11:
viii Glossary and list of abbreviat
Page 13 and 14:
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA
Page 15:
increased risk of serious infection
Page 19 and 20:
Summary RA is a common, chronic, in
Page 21 and 22:
(IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pr
Page 23 and 24:
Assessment of response to DMARDs Re
Page 25 and 26:
combination with methotrexate or al
Page 27:
disease between clinic appointments
Page 30 and 31:
14 Effectiveness in juvenile arthri
Page 32 and 33:
16 Effectiveness adalimumab plus me
Page 34 and 35:
18 Effectiveness Monoclonal Antibod
Page 36 and 37:
20 TABLE 1 Description of included
Page 38 and 39:
22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
Page 40 and 41:
24 Effectiveness change in modified
Page 42 and 43:
26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
Page 44 and 45:
28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 46 and 47:
30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 48 and 49:
32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 50 and 51:
34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 52 and 53:
36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
Page 54 and 55:
38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
Page 56 and 57:
40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
Page 58 and 59:
42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
Page 72 and 73:
56 TABLE 12 Description of included
Page 74 and 75:
58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
Page 76 and 77:
60 Effectiveness per week and escal
Page 78 and 79:
62 Effectiveness significant advant
Page 80 and 81:
64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 82 and 83:
66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 84 and 85:
68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
Page 86 and 87:
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary o
Page 89 and 90:
Summary of review of existing econo
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
Page 97 and 98:
TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
Page 99 and 100:
management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
Page 101 and 102:
To estimate the long-term consequen
Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
Page 107 and 108:
een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
Page 115 and 116:
TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
Page 117 and 118:
following properties, according to
Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 121 and 122:
TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 123 and 124:
TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
Page 125 and 126:
TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 129:
The substantial economic impact of
Page 133 and 134:
Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
Page 135 and 136:
inhibitors, although the incrementa
Page 137 and 138:
introduce bias which generally exag
Page 139:
Adalimumab, etanercept and inflixim
Page 143 and 144:
1. Jobanputra P, Barton P, Bryan S,
Page 145 and 146:
46. Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies
Page 147 and 148:
tumor necrosis factor therapy in th
Page 149 and 150:
arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind,
Page 151 and 152:
171. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson
Page 153 and 154:
216. Schotte H, Willeke P, Mickholz
Page 155 and 156:
The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Page 157 and 158:
Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) 2005 Iss
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 3 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 161:
TABLE 69 Studies excluded from clin
Page 164 and 165:
148 Appendix 4 TABLE 71 Meta-analys
Page 166 and 167: 150 Appendix 4 TABLE 73 Meta-analys
Page 168 and 169: 152 Appendix 4 Infliximab versus pl
Page 170 and 171: 154 Appendix 4 Infliximab plus MTX
Page 173: Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1966 to February we
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 8 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 179 and 180: TABLE 79 Wong et al., 2002 161 © Q
Page 181 and 182: TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 (c
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 82 Brennan et al., 2004 160
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 83 Kobelt et al., 2004 163 (c
Page 187 and 188: TABLE 85 Bansback et al., 2005 166
Page 189: TABLE 86 Kobelt et al., 2005 167 (c
Page 192 and 193: 176 Appendix 9 TABLE 89 Strategy se
Page 195 and 196: Extensive sensitivity analysis was
Page 197 and 198: TABLE 96 Variation 1: TNF inhibitor
Page 199 and 200: TABLE 99 Variation 2: TNF inhibitor
Page 201 and 202: TABLE 102 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 215: TABLE 123 Variation 8: TNF inhibito
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 132 Variation 10: TNF inhibit
Page 243: TABLE 165 Variation 18: TNF inhibit
Page 247 and 248: Volume 1, 1997 No. 1 Home parentera
Page 249 and 250: No. 3 Screening for sickle cell dis
Page 251 and 252: No. 25 A rapid and systematic revie
Page 253 and 254: No. 11 First and second trimester a
Page 255 and 256: No. 23 Clinical effectiveness and c
Page 257 and 258: No. 28 Outcomes of electrically sti
Page 259: No. 28 Adefovir dipivoxil and pegyl
Page 262 and 263: 246 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 264: 248 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?