29.08.2013 Views

Proceedings e report - Firenze University Press

Proceedings e report - Firenze University Press

Proceedings e report - Firenze University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BIODETERIORATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN ESTONIA<br />

Kalle Pilt*<br />

Estonian <strong>University</strong> of Life Sciences, Department of Rural Building, Tartu Estonia<br />

Abstract.<br />

There are about 5000 buildings of some historical value in Estonia with more than 90% of them involving<br />

wooden elements or timber structures. The present paper provides data obtained by a large-scale survey of<br />

hundreds of buildings of cultural value to assess the extent of fungal decay. The survey found the dry rot fungus<br />

(Serpula lacrymans) to be the most invasively spread fungus that buildings all over Estonia have been infested<br />

by. Coniophora puteana is the second most widely spread fungus, though it’s significantly less invasive than<br />

S.lacrymans. Beside the above two fungi, Leucogyrophana spp., and Antrodia spp. are extensively present in<br />

Estonia. In addition to wood decay fungi, there are moulds that can also attack buildings and elements of cultural<br />

value. Although the mould used to be largely neglected in Estonia due to the lack of expertise, since the import<br />

of the relevant know-how from Finland and Sweden the moulds such as Aspergillus spp., Cladosporium spp. and<br />

Penicillium spp. have been identified and counter-measures are being taken. The insect damage was also found<br />

to be rather extensive. While in the continental Estonia Anobium punctatum, Anobium pertinax and Buprestis<br />

haemorrhoidalis are the most widely spread, the islands have a fourth species, i.e. Hylotrupes bajulus as well.<br />

Further studies will involve measuring the strength of structural timber, assessing the extent of fungal decay and<br />

elaborating recommendations for renovating the buildings of cultural value. The results of the study can be<br />

applied by the renovation companies and the administrators of the buildings of cultural value.<br />

Keywords: Cultural Heritage, Dry rot, Wood-destroying fungi, Wood-disfiguring fungi, Serpula lacrymans,<br />

Coniophora puteana<br />

1. Introduction<br />

As of 01.10.08, 23 931 items, including 12 966 items of arts heritage, have been officially registered<br />

as items of cultural heritage of the Republic of Estonia (See the classification in Fig. 1). The majority<br />

of the items of arts heritage are deposited in and protected by museums and arts depositories, with<br />

KUMU in Tallinn being the largest among them. While the depositories have the facilities to maintain<br />

appropriate conservation conditions and major problems with biodeterioration can be prevented, the<br />

items of architectural heritage (5277 in total) run the highest risk of biodeterioration. Across the<br />

centuries, timber and limestone have featured as the main building materials in North, North-East and<br />

West Estonia (including islands), and stones and clay in Central and South Estonia. Therefore, in most<br />

of the buildings timber is either the material applied throughout or in certain parts of the building,<br />

while pine and spruce as the species indigenous of this latitude are the most frequently resorted to. The<br />

main types of deterioration include the fungal attack, beetle infestation and chemical and physical<br />

change [1] of which the present paper addresses the first two detected in the timber parts and elements<br />

of 938 buildings (including 136 items of architectural heritage) surveyed in Estonia in 1999-August<br />

2008.<br />

The fungal attack can be caused either by wood-destroying fungi or by wood-disfiguring fungi [2].<br />

Although the surveyed timber items of cultural heritage featured both of the above types, the former<br />

appears to be substantially more destructive. The wood-destroying fungi can be further divided into<br />

basidiomycete wood-rotting fungi and soft rot fungi, and the wood-disfiguring fungi into bluestain<br />

fungi and moulds, respectively [2]. In addition to the fairly rough classification described, Schmidt<br />

(2006) in ”Wood and Tree Fungi” provides a more complex taxonomy which distinguishes between<br />

wood rot fungi including Brown Rot, White Rot and Soft Rot, and wood discoloration fungi including<br />

Moulds, Bluestain and Red streaking, respectively [3].<br />

* E-mail: Kalle.pilt@emu.ee<br />

Joseph Gril (edited by), Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage –Braga 2008: <strong>Proceedings</strong> of the International<br />

Conference held by COST Action IE0601 (Braga - Portugal, 5-7 November 2008, ISBN 978-88-6453-157-1 (print)<br />

ISBN 978-88-6453-165-6 (online) © 2010 <strong>Firenze</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>Press</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!