20.09.2013 Views

concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie

concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie

concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRK Consulting: Project No: 439414 <strong>Staatsolie</strong> Pipeline <strong>EIA</strong> – Draft <strong>EIA</strong> Report Page 54<br />

• Water Quality and Aquatic Ecology – potential deterioration of water quality in the Suriname<br />

River due to disturbance during the construction of drill pads or leaking of drilling mud during<br />

drilling activities, which could result in an impact on aquatic fauna and flora and water users.<br />

6.1.2 Specialist input<br />

A significant amount of information on environmental aspects in the project area is already available<br />

from previous or ongoing studies, including the:<br />

• Suriname River Dredging Project (SRK, 2008);<br />

• <strong>EIA</strong> undertaken for the <strong>Staatsolie</strong> Refinery Expansion Project (SRK, 2010);<br />

• Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for the proposed pipelines (Burger, 2012);<br />

• Feasibility and/or engineering studies undertaken by <strong>Staatsolie</strong>; and<br />

• Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the proposed pipeline route (SRK, 2012).<br />

The additional specialist input that has been undertaken for this <strong>EIA</strong> is described below:<br />

• Geology and soils: Limited specialist input to confirm the characteristics of the material in which<br />

the pipeline will be installed and the capability of land adjacent to the pipeline route, especially<br />

where the pipeline lies close to the surface and where drill pads will be installed. This information<br />

will also inform the Quantitative Risk Assessment;<br />

• Water quality and aquatic ecology: Limited specialist input to confirm the sensitivity, status<br />

and dynamics of the section of the Suriname River that lies adjacent to the proposed pipeline<br />

route 26 ;<br />

• Terrestrial flora and fauna: Limited specialist input to confirm the sensitivity and status of<br />

vegetation adjacent to the pipeline route, especially where drill pads and laydown areas will be<br />

established, noting that the environment along the proposed route has been severely modified<br />

by human activities; and<br />

• Social: Specialist input to describe the social characteristics of the wider area and the<br />

population that might be affected by the pipeline, both physically through the location of the<br />

pipeline nearby and otherwise through e.g. employment.<br />

A separate QRA is being undertaken for the proposed project. The main findings of that assessment<br />

are reported in the <strong>EIA</strong> (see Section 6.7); and<br />

SRK has assembled a team of local and international specialists to provide the necessary input, as<br />

indicated in Table 6-1 below.<br />

26 A comprehensive aquatic study is not warranted for this project as:<br />

- The pipelines will not be in direct contact with the river once it has been inserted into the drill hole. Impacts from the<br />

pipelines on the river are thus likely to be limited to the construction phase and can be largely mitigated with good<br />

environmental management;<br />

- The river and its western bank are not pristine environments and have been significantly modified; and<br />

- The tidal nature of the Suriname River frequently flushes the river in this area, minimising the magnitude of standard<br />

project impacts, such as limited siltation during construction.<br />

REUT/DALC 439414_<strong>Staatsolie</strong>Pipeline<strong>EIA</strong>_Draft <strong>EIA</strong> Report_Final June 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!