concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie
concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie
concept EIA-rapport - Staatsolie
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SRK Consulting: Project No: 439414 <strong>Staatsolie</strong> Pipeline <strong>EIA</strong> – Draft <strong>EIA</strong> Report Page 54<br />
• Water Quality and Aquatic Ecology – potential deterioration of water quality in the Suriname<br />
River due to disturbance during the construction of drill pads or leaking of drilling mud during<br />
drilling activities, which could result in an impact on aquatic fauna and flora and water users.<br />
6.1.2 Specialist input<br />
A significant amount of information on environmental aspects in the project area is already available<br />
from previous or ongoing studies, including the:<br />
• Suriname River Dredging Project (SRK, 2008);<br />
• <strong>EIA</strong> undertaken for the <strong>Staatsolie</strong> Refinery Expansion Project (SRK, 2010);<br />
• Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for the proposed pipelines (Burger, 2012);<br />
• Feasibility and/or engineering studies undertaken by <strong>Staatsolie</strong>; and<br />
• Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the proposed pipeline route (SRK, 2012).<br />
The additional specialist input that has been undertaken for this <strong>EIA</strong> is described below:<br />
• Geology and soils: Limited specialist input to confirm the characteristics of the material in which<br />
the pipeline will be installed and the capability of land adjacent to the pipeline route, especially<br />
where the pipeline lies close to the surface and where drill pads will be installed. This information<br />
will also inform the Quantitative Risk Assessment;<br />
• Water quality and aquatic ecology: Limited specialist input to confirm the sensitivity, status<br />
and dynamics of the section of the Suriname River that lies adjacent to the proposed pipeline<br />
route 26 ;<br />
• Terrestrial flora and fauna: Limited specialist input to confirm the sensitivity and status of<br />
vegetation adjacent to the pipeline route, especially where drill pads and laydown areas will be<br />
established, noting that the environment along the proposed route has been severely modified<br />
by human activities; and<br />
• Social: Specialist input to describe the social characteristics of the wider area and the<br />
population that might be affected by the pipeline, both physically through the location of the<br />
pipeline nearby and otherwise through e.g. employment.<br />
A separate QRA is being undertaken for the proposed project. The main findings of that assessment<br />
are reported in the <strong>EIA</strong> (see Section 6.7); and<br />
SRK has assembled a team of local and international specialists to provide the necessary input, as<br />
indicated in Table 6-1 below.<br />
26 A comprehensive aquatic study is not warranted for this project as:<br />
- The pipelines will not be in direct contact with the river once it has been inserted into the drill hole. Impacts from the<br />
pipelines on the river are thus likely to be limited to the construction phase and can be largely mitigated with good<br />
environmental management;<br />
- The river and its western bank are not pristine environments and have been significantly modified; and<br />
- The tidal nature of the Suriname River frequently flushes the river in this area, minimising the magnitude of standard<br />
project impacts, such as limited siltation during construction.<br />
REUT/DALC 439414_<strong>Staatsolie</strong>Pipeline<strong>EIA</strong>_Draft <strong>EIA</strong> Report_Final June 2012