18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

that the rate duly applied was unreasonable nor does the record contain facts upon<br />

which such a finding can be made There being no alternative the application is hereby<br />

denied Footnote added<br />

Moreover in East Asiatic supra it was concluded<br />

The Examiner however did not find nor did the applicant allege that the duly<br />

was reasonable<br />

applicable rate was unreasonable and that the rate actually charged<br />

Indeed the record is devoid of any facts upon which we in the final analysis could<br />

make any such findings Therefore on the basis of the record before us we have no<br />

alternative but to deny East Asiatic Inc s application<br />

As the determination of a reasonable lawful rate is a prerequisite to<br />

establishing damages which is the difference between reasonable and<br />

unreasonable rates S and as such determination cannot be made here the<br />

request of Matson Navigation Company to refund a portion and to waive<br />

collection of a portion of the freight charges on the aforementioned<br />

shipments<br />

must be denied<br />

WASHINGTON D C<br />

June 30 <strong>19</strong>76<br />

Mueller v Peralta Shipping Corp 8 F M C 361 <strong>19</strong>65<br />

8 JOHN E COGRAVE<br />

Administrative Law Judge<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!