18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOUGLAS MATERIAL CO v SEA LAND 331<br />

a new tariff which sets forth the rate on which such refund or waiver would be based<br />

The application for refund must be tiled with the <strong>Commission</strong> within one hundred and<br />

eighty days from the date of shipment Finally the carrier must agree that if permission<br />

is granted an appropriate notice will he published in its tariff or such other steps taken<br />

as may be required to give notice of the rate on which such refund or waiver would be<br />

based<br />

The legislative history of the amendment to section 18 of the Shipping<br />

Act Public Law 90298 6<br />

specifies that carriers are authorized to make<br />

voluntary refunds and waive the collection of a portion of their freight<br />

charges for good cause such as bona fide mistake The nature of the<br />

mistake was particularly described<br />

Section 18 b appears to prohibit the <strong>Commission</strong> from authorizing relief where<br />

through bona fide mistake on the part of the carrier the shipper is charged more than he<br />

understood the rate to be For example a carrier after advising a shipperthat he intends<br />

to file a reduced rate and thereafter fails to file the reduced rate with the <strong>Federal</strong><br />

<strong>Maritime</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> must charge the shipper under the aforementioned circumstances<br />

the higher rates<br />

The Senate Report 7 states the Purpose of the Bill<br />

Voluntary refunds to shippers and waiver Qr the collection of a portion of freight<br />

charges are authorized where it appears that there is an error in a tariff of a clerical<br />

nature or where through inadvertence there has been a failure to file a tariff reflecting<br />

an intended rate<br />

It is therefore found that<br />

1 There was an error due to an inadvertence in failing to fIle a new<br />

tariff<br />

2 Such waiver of collection of aportion of the freight charges will not<br />

result in discrimination among shippers<br />

3 Prior to applying for authority to waive collection of a portion of the<br />

freight charges Sea Land fded a new tariff which set forth the rate on<br />

which such waiver would be based<br />

4 The application was filed within one hundred and eighty days from<br />

the date of shipment<br />

Accordingly permission is granted to Sea Land Service Inc to waive<br />

collection ofaportion of the freight charges represented by 74 67<br />

WASHINGTON D C<br />

September 14 <strong>19</strong>76<br />

S JOHN E COGRAVE<br />

Administrative Law Judge<br />

8 House Report No 920 November 14 <strong>19</strong>67 fo accompany H R 9473 on Shipping Act <strong>19</strong> 6 Authorized Refund<br />

of Certain Freight Charges Statement of Purpose and Need for the Bill to Amend Provisions of the Shipping Act<br />

<strong>19</strong>16 10 AUlhorize the <strong>Federal</strong><strong>Maritime</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> to PermitaCarrier to Refund aPOr ion of the Freight Charges<br />

7 Senate Report No 1078 AprilS <strong>19</strong>68rro accompany H R 9473 on Shipping AQCT t Authorized Refund of<br />

Certain Freight Charges underPurpose ofthe Bill<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!