18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

304<br />

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

existed with regard to minibridge service can be expected<br />

interior intermodal if it is not placed<br />

to arise in<br />

under conference<br />

Interior intermodal presents an equal if not greater threat to stability<br />

than does minibridge if only because the volume of cargo potentially<br />

available in intermodal operations from the industrial heartland of the<br />

United States exceeds the volume involved in minibridge Likewise the<br />

multiplicity of tariffs can be expected to present even greater difficulties<br />

than did with regards to minibridge because of the number of tariffs<br />

involved Under the circumstances we see n9 reason or regulatory<br />

pu<br />

se to be served by limiting the Conference s intermodal authority to<br />

mimbridge 16 Accordingly the approval granted herein extends to interior<br />

intermodal as weH<br />

The Administrative Law Judge faults the Conference for not having<br />

taken even preliminary steps leading to implementation of an interior<br />

intermodal tariff under the authority it now seeks To the extent that we<br />

understand this objection we find it to be self defeating How could PWC<br />

be expected to legally implement authority it did not have but now<br />

requests Indeed if the Conference had taken the steps suggested by<br />

the Presiding Officer it could be held to a violation of section 15 for<br />

carrying out an unliled and unapproved section 15 agreement<br />

While the Administrative Law Judge himself concedes that the Confer<br />

ence s failure to take the preliminary steps referred to above does not<br />

per se preclude the <strong>Commission</strong> from approving such authority he<br />

found that it did<br />

raise serious questions as to whether such authority if unexercised will seriously<br />

inhibit the arowth and development of intermodal transportat on<br />

which this <strong>Commission</strong> enCO ll ll8es<br />

thu frustratina a oaI<br />

This statement was based in large measure on the fact that unlike<br />

minibridge Agreement No 5796 as submitted does not permit interim<br />

individqal tariffs<br />

We share in the Presiding Officer s concernthat failure of PWC to<br />

expeditiously publish an interior intermod9J tariff could deprive the<br />

shipping public of benefits which it might otherwise receive if a member<br />

line published an intermodal tariff Accordingly and lonsistent with<br />

established <strong>Commission</strong> policy we are requiring as acondition to the<br />

approval ofAgreement No 57 96 that it bemodmed to permit PWC<br />

member lines to individually offer interniodal service not only as to<br />

minibridge but as to interior intermodal as well until such time as the<br />

Conference implements the authority granted it by the filin ofappro tariffs This requirement should obviate the problem that the Presiding<br />

16 Nor do wereally aee Bny purpose orreason to eYen diltlnaul1h between minibridle and interior intennodat They<br />

are after all both throuah intermodallervicu whil hdiffttr ly In terma of distance Aa IUQb we ablolutelyfaU to<br />

find any sianlflcance to the distlnction that Hearina Counael would draw here<br />

te<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!