18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

DoCKET No 7551<br />

PERRY S CRANE SERVICE INC<br />

v<br />

PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS<br />

PARTIAL ADOPTION OF INITIAL DECISION<br />

February 25 <strong>19</strong>77<br />

By THE COMMISSION Karl E Bakke Chairman Ashton C Barrett and<br />

James V Day<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>ers<br />

This proceeding was commenced with the filing of a complaint by<br />

Perry s Crane Service Perry against the Port of Houston Authority of<br />

Harris County Texas Houston alleging that Houston has been engaging<br />

in certain practices in connection with the rental of heavy crane<br />

equipment which violate sections 16 17 and 18 of the Shipping Act<br />

<strong>19</strong>16 46 D S C 815 816 817 2<br />

The essence of the complaint is that certain tariff rules and related<br />

practices which give Houston s cranes tirst priority on jobs even to the<br />

extent of displacil lg Perry s and other private crane owners equipment<br />

already working are unduly and unreasonably preferential and uqjust<br />

Complainant is seeking arevision of tariff rules and related practices as<br />

well as reparation for the alleged violations<br />

In his Initial Decision Administrative Law Judge<br />

concluded that<br />

Norman D Kline<br />

1 Houston s first call and bumping practices violate sections 16<br />

First and 17 of the Shipping Act <strong>19</strong>16 the Act not only as applied<br />

against private crane operators such as Perry but also with regard to<br />

stevedores hiring private cranes<br />

2 Houston is entitled to a reasonable preference as to its own cranes<br />

and may retain tirst call privileges provided it can timely frrnish a crane<br />

equally suited for the job Houston may also retain its bumping<br />

1 <strong>Commission</strong>er Bob Casey not participatina<br />

At the outset of the hearina with the aareement ofcounsel the Prosidina Officer clarified the scope of the<br />

complaint to encompass only alleaed violations of section 16 Firat and the secondparaaraph of section 17 of the Act<br />

548<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!