18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reparation Denied<br />

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

INFORMAL DocKET No 350 1<br />

UNITED DECORATIVE FLOWER CO INC<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C 341<br />

v<br />

MAERSK LINE<br />

October 14 <strong>19</strong>76<br />

DECISION OF WALDO R PUTNAM SETILEMENT OFFICER<br />

By complaint f1Ied April 5 <strong>19</strong>76 United Decorative Flower Co Inc<br />

complainant alleges that Maersk Line carrier erred in computing the<br />

cubic measurement of a shipment of plastic flowers and foliages from<br />

Bangkok Thailand to Baltimore Maryland resulting in an overcharge of<br />

210 63 While a violation of Shipping Act <strong>19</strong>16 is not alleged it is<br />

presumed to be section 18b 3 which prohibits the assessment offreight<br />

charges in excess of those lawfully applicable at the time of the shipment<br />

In support of its claim the complainant furnished a copy of the packing<br />

list indicating a total measurement of 798 cubic feet 2 a copy of the<br />

carrier s bill of lading indicating a total measurement of 898 cubic feet<br />

and acopy ofaletter from the carrier denying the claim on the basis that<br />

it did not have an opportunity to remeasure the cargo while it still was in<br />

the carrier s possession<br />

In response to the complaint the carrier supplied a copy of the Mate s<br />

Receipt showing that the involved cartons were measured upon receipt of<br />

the cargo at the Bangkok dock prior to shipment 3 The bill of lading was<br />

prepared using the cubic measurement inserted on the Mate s Receipt<br />

arrived at through actual measurement ofthe cargo<br />

Here we have a situation where the<br />

proper measurement of the cargo<br />

was in dispute from the date that the cargo was received by the carrier<br />

According to the facts presented the shipper andor the consignee had<br />

1 Both parties bavin consented to the informal procedure of Rule <strong>19</strong> 46 CFR 502 301 304 as amended this<br />

decision will be final unless the <strong>Commission</strong> elects to review it within 15 days from the dateof service thereof<br />

45 cartons measurina 321 t x 15 t x 28 and 58 cartons measurina 321 t x 151 2 X 25112<br />

s 45 cartons mcuurin<br />

l<br />

x 16 x 29 and 58 cartons measurina 331 2 x 16 x 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!