18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDEX DIGEST<br />

service they must file a tariff listing their through rate and their respective rate<br />

divisions or portions Austasia Container Express 512 5<strong>19</strong><br />

Inasmuch as respondent is a common carrier by water in foreign commerce within the<br />

meaning of section I of the <strong>19</strong>16 Shipping Act it must file a tariffwhich fully complies<br />

with Part 536 of the <strong>Commission</strong> s Rules Id 521<br />

Complainant shipper in a reparation proceeding alleging that it should not have been<br />

assessed handling charges on certain containers pursuant to conference tariff which had<br />

admitted that such charge was proper pursuant to the tariff on containers tendered to<br />

carriersat their container yards was not estoppedfrom asserting that tender at container<br />

yards within the carrier s terminal dock area was tender at the docks within the meaning<br />

of the tariff Dow Chemical International Inc v American President Lines Ltd 531<br />

538<br />

Proceeding to determine the legality under sections 16 17 and 18 b of the <strong>19</strong>16<br />

Shipping Act as amended consolidation allowance provisions contained in tariffs is<br />

discontinued The amended rules had been replaced under court order by the original<br />

rules to the satisfaction of all affected interests The order of investigation referred only<br />

to the amended rules and did not cover a broad study of consolidation rules in general<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong> takes no position at this time as to merits of issues alleged by Hearing<br />

Counsel to have survived the cancellation of the amended rules Consolidation<br />

Allowance Rules 735 736738<br />

Tariffs of 35 nonvessel operating common carriers are cancelled in view of the fact<br />

that they do not actively solicit or provide common carrier services It is misleading to<br />

the public potentially unfair to competing carriers and an administrative burden on the<br />

staff for paper tariffs to be kept on me for possible use if it should suit the narrow<br />

purposes of the persons issuing them to quickly enter the trade but otherwise describing<br />

a nonexistent service Such a situation contravenes the implicit requirements of sections<br />

18 b 1 through 3 of the Shipping Act which necessitate the prompt submission of<br />

accurate information concerning the services offered by a common carrier including the<br />

suspension of all or any part of the operations described by its published tariff<br />

Publication of Inactive Tariffs by Independent Carriers in the Foreign Commerce of the<br />

United States 774 775<br />

A transshipment tariff was cancelled on the date notice of cancellation was received<br />

by the <strong>Commission</strong> not on the prior date when the <strong>Commission</strong> received notice of the<br />

cancellation of the underlying transshipment agreement The <strong>Commission</strong> s rules do not<br />

provide for the automatic cancellation of transshipment tariffs on receipt of notice that<br />

an underlying transshipment agreement has been cancelled As long as thetariffdid not<br />

include an amendment or provision which purported to cancel it the tariffcontained the<br />

only legal rates the carrier could have charged for the transshipment service covered by<br />

that tariff even though the actual provision of such service would have violated section<br />

15 of the Shipping Act States Steamship Co Far EastUSA Household Goods Tariff<br />

No 2 FMC 9 793 796797<br />

A tariff has one ml ior purpose to prevent rebates and other types of unjust<br />

discrimination by publicly stating the rates to be charged all eligible shippers Tariff<br />

fdings are neither adjudicatory matters norfinally determinative of individual rights or<br />

privileges Once accepted by the <strong>Commission</strong> a tariff must be adhered to by the<br />

publishing carrier and shipper alike To retroactively declare a duly accepted tariff void<br />

for noncompliance with the <strong>Commission</strong> rule which requires that a permanent tariff<br />

modification here cancellation of a tariff be filed within 15 days of receipt of a<br />

temporary amendment would contravene the regulatory scheme established by most<br />

federal common carrier statutes including the Shipping Act Id 797<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C<br />

867

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!