Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

KONWAL CO v ORIENTOVERSEAS LINE
paying only the drayage rate from point of rest on the dock to its place of
business in San Francisco
aaCL indicates in its tariff that it serves United States Pacific Coast
Ports The subject eight shipments were accepted by aaCL with San
Francisco indicated as the port of discharge on the covering bills of
lading as requested by the shipper National Mercantile during a six
month period Hong Kong Export Lines Ltd agent for aaCL prepared
and issued the bills of lading
As aaCL s agent accepted the subject bills of lading showing San
Francisco as the port of discharge and aaCL holds out in its tariff to
serve United States Pacific Coast ports it can not utilize the then
discretionary equalization rule to discharge at another port accepting no
responsibility for the added transportation costs incurred by the receiver
Based on the foregoing below are the computations in KaNWAL s
claim for equalization reparation by aaCL
Claim
Local
Freight
Equalization Weight Rate Transportation
Bill Charges
Date
K4l1 42473 Oakland to S F 13 153 103 135 48
surcharge 340
138 88
S F to S F 13 153 67 88 13
uuu Equalization u
K4l2 5 473 Oakland to S F 7 544 as 1 03 103 00
10 000 surcharge 340
S F to S F 7 544 67 50 54
Equalization uu
K4l3 7 2073 Oakland to S F uuu3 702 as 143 71 50
S F to S F
Equalization u
u u u 44
55
160 40
5 000 surcharge 340
3 702 as
4 000
74 90
77 30 80
K4l4 S 23 73 Oakland to S F 2 830 as 120 60 00
5 000 surcharge 2 50
62 50
S F to S F 2 830 82 23 21
K4l5 10 9 73
Equalization
Oakland to S F 1 787 3 11 55 58
surcharge 150
19 F M C
57 08
50 75
86
10
39 29
63