18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

INFORMAL DocKET No 375 1<br />

NATIONAL STARCH CHEMICAL CORPORATION<br />

v<br />

SEA LAND SERVICE INC<br />

Dismissal of Complaint and Discontinuance of Proceeding<br />

DECISION OF RONALD J NIEFORTH SETILEMENT OFFICER<br />

By complaint filed November 26 <strong>19</strong>76 National Starch Chemical<br />

Corporation complainant states that Sea Land Service Inc carrier<br />

declined to honor a claim for freight overcharge of 124 44 on the<br />

grounds that such action would violate item 105 ofthe Leeward<br />

Windward Islands Guianas Conference Tariff F M C No 1 which<br />

prohibits the payment of overcharge claims not presented to the carrier<br />

within six months after date of shipment<br />

The complaint which was served on the carrier November 30 <strong>19</strong>76<br />

prompted the carrier to respond on January 20 <strong>19</strong>77 advising that its<br />

investigation disclosed that the claim for refund was in order Subse<br />

quently in letter of March 2 <strong>19</strong>77 the carrier confnmed that a check in<br />

the amount of 124 44 dated February 2 <strong>19</strong>77 had been sent to the<br />

complainant in settlement of the claim<br />

An analysis of the complaint and supporting documentation together<br />

with a review of the applicable conference tariff confnms the complain<br />

ants allegation relative to the assessment of an improper rate The freight<br />

refund which has been made by the carrier in connection with this Docket<br />

is therefore found to be proper and indeed mandatory to satisfy statutory<br />

Act <strong>19</strong>16<br />

requirements as provided in Section 18b 3 Shipping<br />

The subject complaint is dismissed and this proceeding discontinued<br />

S RONALD J NIEFORTH<br />

Settlement Officer<br />

I<br />

Both parties havlna consented to the formal procedure of Rule <strong>19</strong> of the <strong>Commission</strong> s Rules ofPractice and<br />

Procedure 46 CPR 502 301 304 tbie decision will be final unlesl tbe<strong>Commission</strong> elects to review it within 15 days<br />

from dateof service tbercof Noto Notice ofdetermination not to review May 18 1m<br />

800<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!