18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CUMMINS ENGINE CO v U S LINES 389<br />

Cylinder blocks and crankshafts are named in the disputed tariff item<br />

53207<br />

Complainant s contention that the commodities shipped are parts ofa<br />

cylinder block assembly appears to be a reasonable one<br />

Webster s Third New International Dictionary ofthe English Language<br />

Unabridged <strong>19</strong>64 defmes an assembly as<br />

5a the act or process of building up a complete unit as a motor vehicle using parts<br />

already in themselves finished manufacture products b a collection of parts so<br />

assembled as to form a complete machine structure orunit of a machine<br />

Webster s New World Dictionary College Edition <strong>19</strong>68 defines<br />

assembly as<br />

4 a fittingtogether of parts to make a whole as in making automobiles<br />

5 the parts to be thus fitted together<br />

From the above definitions of an assembly it can reasonably be<br />

concluded that cylinder block assemblies include those parts of an engine<br />

the end<br />

that go into or are attached to the cylinder block to make up<br />

related to the<br />

product which can be reasonably considered directly<br />

construction of an engine An exploded view of an engine readily shows<br />

a connecting rod gear cover and camshaft go into or are directly<br />

attached to the cylinder block<br />

Tariff Item No 532007 is not at all specific as to what component<br />

parts constitute a cylinder block assembly aside from indicating such<br />

assembly may be with or without crankshafts Such a description is so<br />

unclear that reasonable men could differ on its application Where an<br />

ambiguity<br />

does exist then the tariff must be construed in such a marmer<br />

so as to resolve such ambiguity in favor of the shipper 6<br />

In addition the <strong>Commission</strong> has long recognized<br />

that tariff terms<br />

should be interpreted reasonably In National Cable and Metal Co v<br />

American Hawaii S S Co 2 U S M C 471 <strong>19</strong>41 the <strong>Commission</strong> s<br />

predecessor stated<br />

In interpreting a tariff the terms used must be taken in the sense in which they are<br />

generally understood and accepted commercially and neither carriers nor shippers<br />

should be permitted to urge for their own purposes a strained and unnatural<br />

construction Tariffs are to be interpreted according to the reasonable construction of<br />

their language neither to the intent of the framers nor the practice of the carrier<br />

controls for the shipper cannot be charged with knowledge of such intent or with<br />

carrier s canons of instruction A proper test is whether the article may be reasonably<br />

identified by the tariff description underlining supplied<br />

Since connecting rod assembly head assembly gear cover and<br />

camshaft are not specifically excluded by Item 53207 it can only be<br />

concluded that they reasonably fall within the general description of<br />

cylinder block assemblies and should have been so rated A proper case<br />

1I United Nations Children Fund v Blue Sea Line 15 FMC 206 209 <strong>19</strong>72<br />

1 Alsosee Johns Manville Products Corporation 13 FMC <strong>19</strong>4 <strong>19</strong>70 and Bulkley Dunton Overseas SA v Blue<br />

Star Shipping Corp 8 FMC 137 140 <strong>19</strong>64<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!