18.10.2013 Views

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

Full Volume 19 - Federal Maritime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222<br />

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION<br />

the bill of lading port without distinguishing between LTL and trailerJoad<br />

shipments Similarly no other provision of the Respondenfs tariff added<br />

such a qualification<br />

Section l8 b 1 of the Shipping Act <strong>19</strong>16 provides that tariffs shall<br />

contain any<br />

rules or regulations which in anywise change affect or<br />

determine the tariff rates Consequently the Respondent carrier could<br />

not by a statement of policy no matter how widely published establish a<br />

rule binding on shippers unless such rule was first filed with the<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> under section 18 b An unflled rule distinguishing between<br />

LTL and trailer load shipments not only cannot be relied upon to deny<br />

reparation but itself violates section 18 b 3 of the Act by denying<br />

transportation privileges to LTL shippers in a manner not stated in<br />

Respondent s Tariff<br />

The Respondent states in its answer to the complaint that it changed its<br />

policy in October <strong>19</strong>74 and began paying equalization on the Claimant s<br />

shipments Thus at that time Respondent began to fully adhere to its<br />

tariff rule without asserting any other disqualification in Claimant s<br />

shipments Therefore there being no other defects in the Claimant s<br />

shipments at issue here the Claimant is entitled to reparation as set forth<br />

in its complaint<br />

An appropriate Order will be issued<br />

SEAL S FRANCIS C HURNEY<br />

Secretary<br />

<strong>19</strong> F M C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!