25.12.2013 Views

Facsimile PDF - Online Library of Liberty

Facsimile PDF - Online Library of Liberty

Facsimile PDF - Online Library of Liberty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

320 METHODS OF SOCIAL REFORM.<br />

partment.* An impartial review <strong>of</strong> the whole question can<br />

only lead us to the conclusion thac the bankers are right<br />

in crying ont to the Government, “Let us alone !” It is<br />

a new phase <strong>of</strong> the old economic adage-laissez fuire-laissaz<br />

pa.wer; the only novelty in the matter is, that the cry is<br />

now addressed to EL great Minister and an eminent economist,<br />

tho latter <strong>of</strong> whom has advocated in his writings what the<br />

former has, to a great extent, carried into effect.<br />

But to return to our more immcdiatc topic <strong>of</strong> Postal Kotes,<br />

I will now poiut out that it is only government interfereuco<br />

which provents bankers from organising a system <strong>of</strong> small<br />

payments by choqucs, far mor0 perfect, safe, and convenient<br />

than anything the Post Office can do. The Cheque Bank<br />

has nlready done more tllm the department; it has dons a<br />

largo business in small payments, with almost complc~to freedom<br />

from frsud, and has paid at the snmo time a large revenue to<br />

Govornment through the peuny cheque stamp. But this penny<br />

tax, though qtaito inconsiderablo in larger payments, becomes<br />

intolerably oppressive ill the case <strong>of</strong> paymcnts undcr a pound<br />

or two pounds. Tho Post Office probably loses on the smeller<br />

trnusactiouv <strong>of</strong> tho mouey order system, and what revenue it<br />

does seem to gain is gained on tho larger orders, at least so<br />

The dtutid holds. For my part, I cannot see how we can be<br />

aure thero is any gain at all, because the business is conducted<br />

* In Iris speech on the Savings Bank Bill (JLIIIC 18th), Mr. Gladstone<br />

is reported to hnve said : I‘ If they had in this country a blrnking eptcm<br />

so largely derciopcd that it went into every town and considerable<br />

parish, hc rertninly should bc very doubtful indccd as to the desirability<br />

<strong>of</strong> raising the uppcr limit <strong>of</strong> f2W. . . . The Post Office Sarings Banks<br />

for tho threc kingdoms were already bcFond 6,000, and werc rising at<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> 300 banks n year ; but the other banks, notwithstanding the<br />

extellcut dcsclopment which they hsd undcrgone, hardly reached 2,000,<br />

banks and branches taken together.”<br />

Them must bo some mistake here ; for Nr. Kewmarch’s figures show<br />

the total number <strong>of</strong> banks and branch <strong>of</strong>fices in the United Kingdom to<br />

be 3,554, or 78 per cent. more than Mr. Gladstone is reported to have<br />

said. Moreorer, the branches, as shown above, are being multiplied<br />

in an advancing ratio <strong>of</strong> multiplication! Clearly, according to &.<br />

Gladstone’s own admission, ho ought to rciinquish tho part <strong>of</strong> the Bill<br />

raisiug the limit OE deposits.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!