26.12.2013 Views

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(53) *J’ai lu de livres<br />

I have read of books<br />

The correct empirical generalization seems <strong>to</strong> be that de phrases in argument position<br />

are licensed only by two classes of elements: negative quantifiers like pas, personne,<br />

jamais, aucun, guère, rarement 3 and degree quantifiers like beaucoup, assez, tellement<br />

etc. and combien. Given that the distribution of de phrases in argument position is so<br />

restricted, analyses of these structures are obliged <strong>to</strong> propose some link, be it syntactic<br />

or semantic, between the quantifier and the de phrase. However, in the incorporation<br />

analysis, the formation of a complex predicate and the subsequent binding of the event<br />

variable are treated as two independent processes. This leaves the distribution of de<br />

phrases in argument position unaccounted for.<br />

Secondly, I argue that the incorporation analysis makes wrong predictions for the<br />

interpretations that may be assigned <strong>to</strong> QAD sentences. The interpretation for J’ai<br />

beaucoup lu de livres given in (51) requires only that there be at least one participant<br />

in every event. QAD sentences constructed in this way are predicted <strong>to</strong> be true if the<br />

object is the same in every event. However, QAD sentences are subject <strong>to</strong> an additional<br />

requirement:<br />

(54) Multiplicity of Objects Requirement:<br />

QAD sentences are only true in contexts involving multiple objects<br />

(52) La regle establie dans cette Remarque doit estre observée à la rigueur. Il n’y a que les Gascons<br />

& ceux de quelques Provinces voisines qui ne peuvent s’accoustumer à s’y soumettre"<br />

(Académie française (1705), t.2 : 558) .<br />

The rule established in this Remark must be rigourously observed. Only the Gascons and those<br />

people from some neighbouring provinces that cannot become accus<strong>to</strong>med <strong>to</strong> submit <strong>to</strong> it.<br />

I therefore assume that the presence of de before prenominal mono-syllabic adjectives is an artificial<br />

stylistic device that does not have much relation <strong>to</strong> the basic principles that underly the general licensing<br />

of de in the language.<br />

3 The formal characterization of this class will be given in chapter 4.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!