26.12.2013 Views

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3.3 Summary<br />

In the study of the evolution of split DPs in the his<strong>to</strong>ry of French, we have observed<br />

that in, Middle French, QAD was possible from both a VP peripheral position and a TP<br />

peripheral position. I showed that these are both positions for the adverbs beaucoup<br />

and peu that are independently possible in the language. The coincidence between<br />

the positions available for beaucoup in adverbial and split constructions, combined the<br />

fact that beaucoup can quantify over objects in existential split constructions, suggests<br />

that it is at this point in the language that a process of semantic widening <strong>to</strong>ok place in<br />

the domains of the degree quantifiers, and that is what gave rise <strong>to</strong> QAD structures of<br />

the form found in Modern Québec French.<br />

I hypothesized that this widening was due <strong>to</strong> the loss of V2 from OF <strong>to</strong> the end<br />

of MF. When the grammar changed during the Middle French period <strong>to</strong> a non V2<br />

grammar, MF lost the ability <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>picalize beaucoup. Thus the two homophonous<br />

degree quantifiers that could occupy the first position in the sentence were neutralized<br />

in<strong>to</strong> a single adverbial quantifier with a large domain.<br />

Additionally, this study has informed us on the source of dialectal variation between<br />

Québec French and Standard French. Since QAD is possible in existential sentences<br />

in MF, we know that this language did not have a multiplicity of events requirement.<br />

Therefore, it seems safe <strong>to</strong> conclude that it was the more complex unreducible<br />

binary quantifier that developed out of a unary one. This result is of interest <strong>to</strong> a theory<br />

of semantic change, since, in other areas of language change, change is often viewed<br />

as a simplifying process.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!