26.12.2013 Views

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

She proposes that nouns contain two theta positions: < r > (for ‘referential’ cf.<br />

Williams (1981)), and < q > (for ‘quantity’ ). This < q > position can be ± scalar.<br />

The feature [+ scalar] is assigned based on whether a noun has culmulative reference.<br />

Therefore, singular count nouns are [− scalar]; whereas, plural and mass nouns are<br />

[+ scalar]. Since de phrases are also cumulative, Doetjes proposes that they contain a<br />

scalar < q > position that must be satisfied by an appropriate quantifier. In Doetjes’<br />

system, the quantifiers that may satisfy a scalar < q > position are degree quantifiers<br />

like beaucoup. This is why beaucoup can satisfy the < q > position inside the de<br />

phrase in CQ sentences like J’ai lu beaucoup de livres.<br />

Doetjes proposes that verbs also have two theta positions: < e > (for ‘event’), and<br />

a < q > position. In sentences with a purely adverbial beaucoup, like J’ai beaucoup<br />

dormi ‘I slept a lot’, beaucoup satisfies the < q > position inside the verb.<br />

In a QAD sentence, Doetjes proposes that the < q > position of the de phrase<br />

is identified via a small clause with the < q > position of the verb. QAD sentences<br />

therefore have the structure in (64)<br />

(64) Doetjes (1997: 263, her (24))<br />

VP <br />

DQ <br />

VP <br />

V <br />

SC <br />

NP <br />

AuxP <br />

AuxP <br />

PRED<br />

Evaluating Doetjes’ proposal from a formal semantic point of view is difficult: her<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!