26.12.2013 Views

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

Formal Approaches to Semantic Microvariation: Adverbial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in this way <strong>to</strong> account for another semantic pattern observed with anti-additive quantifiers.<br />

As noticed by Muller (1991) and Ladusaw (1992), sentences with anti-additive<br />

quantifiers in French allow negative concord (NC) readings. In the vast majority of<br />

contexts, French sentences with multiple N-words are interpreted as having a single<br />

negation. For example, although (6) contains two negative quantifiers, personne and<br />

rien, on the most salient reading of this sentence, the two negations do not cancel each<br />

other out.<br />

(6) Personne a rien fait<br />

No one has nothing done<br />

‘No one did anything’<br />

There is a second way of interpreting (6), namely one in which personne and rien do<br />

cancel each other out. This is the double negation reading (‘No one did nothing’).<br />

de Swart & Sag (2002) propose that ambiguity between double negation readings and<br />

negative concord readings in sentences such as in (6) is due <strong>to</strong> the existence of rule of<br />

semantic composition in the grammar of French called Resumption. This rule applies<br />

<strong>to</strong> sequences of anti-additive quantifiers and absorbs them in<strong>to</strong> a complex with a single<br />

polyadic negative quantifier NO’. The rule for k-ary resumption is given in (7).<br />

(7) k-ary resumption:<br />

The k-ary resumption of a (type < 1,1 > quantifier Q is a type < 1 k ,k > quantifier<br />

Q ′ with the following interpretation:<br />

Q ′A 1,A 2 ,...A k<br />

E<br />

(R) = Q A 1×A 2 ×A k<br />

(R)<br />

E k<br />

Where A 1 ...A k are subsets of the universe of discourse E.<br />

(de Swart & Sag (2002: 385))<br />

Crucially here, de Swart & Sag analyze (almost) all anti-additive quantifiers as being<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!