08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

He tried to persuade me not to have a ‘general’ for so long that I became<br />

tearful. The ice treatment I had never struck before <strong>and</strong> found it difficult<br />

to tell where the numbness stopped, <strong>and</strong> I also did not think it necessary<br />

to keep testing with the ice right on up to <strong>and</strong> including my bosom area.<br />

All in all, I was upset by the whole proceedings with Mr Lucas.<br />

I did not like his manner, <strong>and</strong> feel it should be reported.”<br />

<strong>Report</strong>s to management<br />

6.13 There are varying accounts of how concerns about Dr Lucas’ use of ice was<br />

brought to the Theatre Manager’s attention. A technician who had observed Dr<br />

Lucas using ice thought one of her colleagues had advised the Theatre<br />

Manager. According to the Theatre Manager this ice incident occurred on the<br />

same day that she completed the incident form about Dr Lucas’ re-use of<br />

syringes, which was in November 1999. The Theatre Manager’s undated<br />

h<strong>and</strong>written document, written after her return from leave on 11 October 1999,<br />

referred to an anaesthetic technician reporting an ice incident. The Theatre<br />

Manager has not been able to find this incident form.<br />

6.14 The Charge Anaesthetic Technician was absent from the theatre when the ice<br />

incident occurred on about Wednesday 10 November 1999. She was told<br />

about it on her return. She was not sure what to do about her staff’s concerns<br />

(two anaesthetic staff <strong>and</strong> several nurses were present at the meeting), so she<br />

took the evening to think about it. When she got to work the next day she<br />

happened to hear Dr Lucas ask for the name <strong>and</strong> phone number of the “ice<br />

incident” patient. She was very concerned about this.<br />

6.15 Dr Lucas responded to this as follows:<br />

“Reading [para 6.14 of the <strong>Report</strong>] has given me new insight into a<br />

situation that I had reported to Mr Madden <strong>and</strong> have reported to your<br />

[investigation team]. It had to do with a patient who had been admitted<br />

solely for an epidural steroid injection for chronic back pain, which I<br />

did. When injecting the steroid, it is st<strong>and</strong>ard practice to verify the<br />

position of the needle by injecting some local anaesthetic with it <strong>and</strong><br />

demonstrating an area of anaesthesia on the skin, in my case using ice. I<br />

wanted to make a follow-up telephone call to the patient to ask about<br />

possible side effects of the procedure <strong>and</strong> its effect on her pain. The<br />

theatre nurses who would not use their access to the computer to obtain<br />

the telephone number thwarted me in my efforts. I had no idea that the<br />

ice-use dynamic was going on subversively in the background. Having<br />

consultants contact their patients post operatively is seen by many as an<br />

exemplary level of practice. I took this issue to Mr Madden but he was<br />

unwilling or unable to persuade the nurses to give me a telephone<br />

number.”<br />

6.16 The Quality Co-ordinator informed the investigation team that she had never<br />

received an incident form on any ice incident. A theatre nurse who had<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!