Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Operating Theatre Protocols<br />
He tried to persuade me not to have a ‘general’ for so long that I became<br />
tearful. The ice treatment I had never struck before <strong>and</strong> found it difficult<br />
to tell where the numbness stopped, <strong>and</strong> I also did not think it necessary<br />
to keep testing with the ice right on up to <strong>and</strong> including my bosom area.<br />
All in all, I was upset by the whole proceedings with Mr Lucas.<br />
I did not like his manner, <strong>and</strong> feel it should be reported.”<br />
<strong>Report</strong>s to management<br />
6.13 There are varying accounts of how concerns about Dr Lucas’ use of ice was<br />
brought to the Theatre Manager’s attention. A technician who had observed Dr<br />
Lucas using ice thought one of her colleagues had advised the Theatre<br />
Manager. According to the Theatre Manager this ice incident occurred on the<br />
same day that she completed the incident form about Dr Lucas’ re-use of<br />
syringes, which was in November 1999. The Theatre Manager’s undated<br />
h<strong>and</strong>written document, written after her return from leave on 11 October 1999,<br />
referred to an anaesthetic technician reporting an ice incident. The Theatre<br />
Manager has not been able to find this incident form.<br />
6.14 The Charge Anaesthetic Technician was absent from the theatre when the ice<br />
incident occurred on about Wednesday 10 November 1999. She was told<br />
about it on her return. She was not sure what to do about her staff’s concerns<br />
(two anaesthetic staff <strong>and</strong> several nurses were present at the meeting), so she<br />
took the evening to think about it. When she got to work the next day she<br />
happened to hear Dr Lucas ask for the name <strong>and</strong> phone number of the “ice<br />
incident” patient. She was very concerned about this.<br />
6.15 Dr Lucas responded to this as follows:<br />
“Reading [para 6.14 of the <strong>Report</strong>] has given me new insight into a<br />
situation that I had reported to Mr Madden <strong>and</strong> have reported to your<br />
[investigation team]. It had to do with a patient who had been admitted<br />
solely for an epidural steroid injection for chronic back pain, which I<br />
did. When injecting the steroid, it is st<strong>and</strong>ard practice to verify the<br />
position of the needle by injecting some local anaesthetic with it <strong>and</strong><br />
demonstrating an area of anaesthesia on the skin, in my case using ice. I<br />
wanted to make a follow-up telephone call to the patient to ask about<br />
possible side effects of the procedure <strong>and</strong> its effect on her pain. The<br />
theatre nurses who would not use their access to the computer to obtain<br />
the telephone number thwarted me in my efforts. I had no idea that the<br />
ice-use dynamic was going on subversively in the background. Having<br />
consultants contact their patients post operatively is seen by many as an<br />
exemplary level of practice. I took this issue to Mr Madden but he was<br />
unwilling or unable to persuade the nurses to give me a telephone<br />
number.”<br />
6.16 The Quality Co-ordinator informed the investigation team that she had never<br />
received an incident form on any ice incident. A theatre nurse who had<br />
93