08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

PSA Testing Procedures<br />

• scant documentation for the quality control system <strong>and</strong> review of the<br />

department’s internal <strong>and</strong> external quality control was non-existent.<br />

5.16 THL took the suspension of Biochemistry in late 1998 seriously <strong>and</strong> took the<br />

following steps:<br />

• employed a consultant technologist to set up a new system for quality<br />

assurance <strong>and</strong> management of the laboratory;<br />

• prepared an action plan which was approved by IANZ, with reporting<br />

criteria;<br />

• employed a Laboratory Manager, who was an IANZ accredited<br />

assessor, to manage the process; <strong>and</strong><br />

• appointed a quality assurance officer with the aid of the IANZ assessor.<br />

5.17 IANZ was satisfied with the remedial steps <strong>and</strong> reaccredited the biochemistry<br />

section of the laboratory. However, it is clear from both the IANZ special<br />

assessment on 17-18 July 2000 <strong>and</strong> from this investigation that many of the<br />

deficiencies identified by IANZ in December 1998 had not been adequately<br />

corrected by March 2000.<br />

5.18 THL pointed out in their response to the provisional opinion that “senior<br />

management relied on the level of surveillance by IANZ, <strong>and</strong> the skills of the<br />

laboratory manager to ensure that laboratory services met quality st<strong>and</strong>ards”.<br />

5.19 How was it, then, that IANZ lifted the suspension of registration? IANZ<br />

provides a general, overall assessment of the procedures being used within a<br />

laboratory. It does not attempt to provide a detailed audit of all of the<br />

procedures. IANZ see its function as carrying out an assessment of a<br />

laboratory that is assumed to have quality systems in place, sufficient to meet<br />

all of the st<strong>and</strong>ards laid down by IANZ for accreditation. In the process of<br />

carrying out the assessment, the assessors may detect practices that fall short<br />

of these st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> these will then be raised as Corrective Action Requests<br />

(CAR). It is a very rare event for a CAR to be serious enough to result in deregistration.<br />

5.20 It is a requirement of the Code of Laboratory Management Practice that<br />

internal audits be carried out by each laboratory at least once every 12 months,<br />

by a suitably qualified technologist from another section of the laboratory or<br />

another laboratory. The IANZ Assessment <strong>Report</strong> of July 2000 found this<br />

requirement had not been complied with.<br />

The proposal to contract out<br />

5.21 The THL Board received a proposal to contract out laboratory services at its<br />

meeting in May 1999. The former Chairperson commented that this was the<br />

third strategy the Board had been asked to endorse, following earlier strategies<br />

of purchase of the private laboratory <strong>and</strong> competing for community referred<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!