Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
PSA Testing Procedures<br />
• scant documentation for the quality control system <strong>and</strong> review of the<br />
department’s internal <strong>and</strong> external quality control was non-existent.<br />
5.16 THL took the suspension of Biochemistry in late 1998 seriously <strong>and</strong> took the<br />
following steps:<br />
• employed a consultant technologist to set up a new system for quality<br />
assurance <strong>and</strong> management of the laboratory;<br />
• prepared an action plan which was approved by IANZ, with reporting<br />
criteria;<br />
• employed a Laboratory Manager, who was an IANZ accredited<br />
assessor, to manage the process; <strong>and</strong><br />
• appointed a quality assurance officer with the aid of the IANZ assessor.<br />
5.17 IANZ was satisfied with the remedial steps <strong>and</strong> reaccredited the biochemistry<br />
section of the laboratory. However, it is clear from both the IANZ special<br />
assessment on 17-18 July 2000 <strong>and</strong> from this investigation that many of the<br />
deficiencies identified by IANZ in December 1998 had not been adequately<br />
corrected by March 2000.<br />
5.18 THL pointed out in their response to the provisional opinion that “senior<br />
management relied on the level of surveillance by IANZ, <strong>and</strong> the skills of the<br />
laboratory manager to ensure that laboratory services met quality st<strong>and</strong>ards”.<br />
5.19 How was it, then, that IANZ lifted the suspension of registration? IANZ<br />
provides a general, overall assessment of the procedures being used within a<br />
laboratory. It does not attempt to provide a detailed audit of all of the<br />
procedures. IANZ see its function as carrying out an assessment of a<br />
laboratory that is assumed to have quality systems in place, sufficient to meet<br />
all of the st<strong>and</strong>ards laid down by IANZ for accreditation. In the process of<br />
carrying out the assessment, the assessors may detect practices that fall short<br />
of these st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> these will then be raised as Corrective Action Requests<br />
(CAR). It is a very rare event for a CAR to be serious enough to result in deregistration.<br />
5.20 It is a requirement of the Code of Laboratory Management Practice that<br />
internal audits be carried out by each laboratory at least once every 12 months,<br />
by a suitably qualified technologist from another section of the laboratory or<br />
another laboratory. The IANZ Assessment <strong>Report</strong> of July 2000 found this<br />
requirement had not been complied with.<br />
The proposal to contract out<br />
5.21 The THL Board received a proposal to contract out laboratory services at its<br />
meeting in May 1999. The former Chairperson commented that this was the<br />
third strategy the Board had been asked to endorse, following earlier strategies<br />
of purchase of the private laboratory <strong>and</strong> competing for community referred<br />
161