Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Quality Assurance Systems<br />
1.28 A new quality person has recently been appointed for mental health services.<br />
No formal link to the Quality Co-ordinator has been identified. However, the<br />
Quality Co-ordinator indicated that they could provide support to each other.<br />
2. QUALITY PLANNING PROCESS<br />
2.1 The Quality <strong>and</strong> Risk Management Policy states that the Chief Executive is<br />
responsible for ensuring that a comprehensive <strong>and</strong> effective quality <strong>and</strong> risk<br />
management programme is developed <strong>and</strong> evaluated at least annually.<br />
2.2 THL’s 2000-2001 Business Plan notes that THL is wanting to shift to a culture<br />
of continuous improvement. The quality component of the THL 2000-2001<br />
Business Plan lists strategies for the current year. These are to:<br />
• promote <strong>and</strong> support a customer service focus<br />
• achieve <strong>and</strong> maintain compliance with appropriate st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />
• integrate <strong>and</strong> co-ordinate delivery of care that meets or exceeds<br />
expectations<br />
• achieve external accreditation.<br />
2.3 Accountabilities <strong>and</strong> time frames for achieving these strategies are not stated,<br />
<strong>and</strong> there is no overview of other aspects of the quality programme – eg, the<br />
audit <strong>and</strong> clinical indicator programmes. No evidence was sighted of an<br />
annual evaluation of the quality <strong>and</strong> risk management programme. Terms of<br />
reference for committees <strong>and</strong> groups that form the quality structure do not<br />
state where accountability lies for annual evaluation. In reply, THL pointed<br />
out that the service plans <strong>and</strong> Business Plan included numerous specific<br />
quality projects <strong>and</strong> improvement targets, as well as requiring monthly<br />
progress reports to the Board.<br />
2.4 Interviews indicated a lack of staff involvement in the quality planning process<br />
<strong>and</strong> a perception that it was a financially driven process, although THL stated<br />
that there are no financial obligations tied to achievements with the quality<br />
assurance programme. In an attempt to address staff’s lack of participation<br />
<strong>and</strong> increase their knowledge the Quality Co-ordinator held workshops on<br />
accreditation <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards around the hospital. The first workshop looked at<br />
quality <strong>and</strong> staff were encouraged to participate in the development of their<br />
own service quality plans.<br />
2.5 The Quality Co-ordinator was concerned about the lack of alignment between<br />
the THL Business Plan <strong>and</strong> individual service plans. It appears the links<br />
between individual services <strong>and</strong> management, in relation to service goals, are<br />
not well developed.<br />
2.6 The Chief Executive stated that business <strong>and</strong> service plans set out individual<br />
service objectives in terms of quality, <strong>and</strong> line managers are accountable for<br />
25