08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Recommendations<br />

15. The Quality Co-ordinator <strong>and</strong> clinical staff should be involved in the evaluation<br />

of the effectiveness of the recently established Quality Facilitator <strong>and</strong> Quality<br />

Administrator positions.<br />

16. Management <strong>and</strong> staff should identify key performance indicators for the<br />

organisation <strong>and</strong> individual services (clinical <strong>and</strong> non-clinical) <strong>and</strong> establish<br />

acceptable/non acceptable levels against which performance is measured.<br />

Incident reporting <strong>and</strong> complaints procedure<br />

1. A cross-functional team (with clear terms of reference) should be established to<br />

evaluate <strong>and</strong> further develop the current incident reporting system, with a<br />

particular emphasis on developing a framework that guides: what to report; which<br />

incidents will be reviewed; <strong>and</strong> by whom.<br />

2. The purpose of the Incident <strong>and</strong> Complaint Management Policy should be<br />

extended to include a statement that reflects the value of complaints/incidents as<br />

learning opportunities for the organisation <strong>and</strong> as a component of continuous<br />

improvement.<br />

3. An internal investigation of a complaint or review of a reported incident should<br />

lead to internal disciplinary processes or m<strong>and</strong>atory training only where there is<br />

evidence of repeated poor performance that breaches professional st<strong>and</strong>ards of<br />

conduct or constitutes a major departure from the st<strong>and</strong>ard of care <strong>and</strong> skill<br />

reasonably to be expected in the circumstances.<br />

4. Definitions of reportable incidents should be reviewed <strong>and</strong> consideration given to<br />

clearly differentiating “incidents”, “near misses” <strong>and</strong> “adverse events”.<br />

5. The layout <strong>and</strong> content of the incident report form should be reviewed <strong>and</strong><br />

consideration given to further information that it may be valuable to capture, such<br />

as the location where the incident occurred, the outcome, contributing factors,<br />

<strong>and</strong> whether the incident was preventable.<br />

6. Numbers should be printed on the incident forms to enable tracking, <strong>and</strong> hard<br />

copies should be kept in the reporting department.<br />

7. Consideration should be given to categorising incidents (eg clinical/non-clinical;<br />

major/minor; actual/potential) to enable investigation, reporting, quality<br />

improvement <strong>and</strong> monitoring to be effectively targeted.<br />

8. The text of the Incident <strong>and</strong> Complaint Management Policy should be reviewed<br />

<strong>and</strong> requirements relating to incidents <strong>and</strong> complaints should be more clearly<br />

differentiated from each other.<br />

9. A st<strong>and</strong>ardised approach to incident investigation should be adopted across<br />

Tairawhiti District <strong>Health</strong> to enhance consistency of investigations, reduce staff<br />

anxiety <strong>and</strong> provide the basis for educating staff who have this responsibility.<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!