Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Patient Care in ICU <strong>and</strong> Surgery<br />
7. unification of management with clinical staff to give a clearly stated<br />
strategy of support for an on site intensive care unit.<br />
4.10 The new Chief Executive, Mr Jim Green, advised that:<br />
“Following the report of Associate Professor Jack Havill <strong>and</strong> Hayley<br />
McConnell, known as the <strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> Quality Review of Ward 7 [ICU]<br />
which was received in August 2000, THL began a process of implementing<br />
the recommendations of the report. There were seven recommendations <strong>and</strong> by<br />
[mid-February 2001] all of the recommendations had been instituted except<br />
the final review of staffing levels, which was commenced in February 2001.<br />
In September 2000 Peter Gow <strong>and</strong> Mary Gordon carried out a report on the<br />
Incident <strong>Report</strong>ing System at <strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong>. The final report was<br />
received in October 2000 <strong>and</strong> with the reaffirmation of the role of the Clinical<br />
Board it was decided that the Board should review <strong>and</strong> put in place a<br />
programme to implement the recommendations of this report. The Clinical<br />
Board completed <strong>and</strong> approved an action plan by December 2000. The<br />
Clinical Board now has a reporting mechanism each month from the plan with<br />
specific members responsible for reporting back to the Board on the<br />
implementation process.<br />
Coupled with this is the wider Surgical <strong>and</strong> ICU Quality Improvement Actions<br />
<strong>Report</strong>. While this report contains actions that are the same as the Havill &<br />
McConnell report <strong>and</strong> the Gow & Gordon reports, there are also a series of<br />
actions instituted by the organisation. These are part of the ongoing quality<br />
improvement programme that has always been in place but which has been<br />
boosted over the more recent period as part of re-affirming the organisation’s<br />
focus on quality of service provision. TDH is committed to continuing this<br />
focus into the future both by the completion of the external review<br />
recommendations but also through a robust quality improvement programme<br />
centered on patients’ needs.”<br />
4.11 The new Chief Executive provided a table of Quality Improvement Projects in<br />
intensive care <strong>and</strong> surgical services <strong>and</strong> commented:<br />
“There has been consistent progress to improve the quality of services<br />
provided by the Intensive Care Unit <strong>and</strong> Surgical Services.”<br />
4.12 I have reviewed the table of Quality Improvement Projects <strong>and</strong> am impressed<br />
by the range of activities being undertaken by Tairawhiti District <strong>Health</strong> to<br />
improve the quality of patient care in ICU <strong>and</strong> Surgery at <strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong>.<br />
5. OPINION<br />
5.1 The anonymous letter (described in para 1.2 above) was written by an<br />
experienced ICU nurse concerned about patient safety. In a well functioning<br />
organisation I would expect a nurse concerned about patient safety to be able<br />
to approach his or her immediate leader or someone in a position of<br />
responsibility within the organisation, <strong>and</strong> to have the concerns dealt with in<br />
an appropriate manner. I do not expect that management will always agree<br />
177