Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Operating Theatre Protocols<br />
7 December 1999 Incident report reviewed by Clinical<br />
Director (Surgery)<br />
16 March 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> issue reported on TVOne news<br />
17 March 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> issue reported in NZ Herald<br />
17 March 2000 E-mail from Northl<strong>and</strong> CEO re “anaesthetic<br />
issue” (this alluded to previous media story):<br />
“We have a problem with one of our<br />
anaesthetists. My initial enquiries have<br />
disclosed some interesting facts which I am<br />
told are common practices in this country.<br />
No-one counter checks …. Although many<br />
things are counted <strong>and</strong> recounted in theatre,<br />
syringes are not.”<br />
CEO e-mail query to Theatre Manager,<br />
Clinical Director (Surgery) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong><br />
Manager re “What is our practice? Do we<br />
have a similar risk?”<br />
Clinical Director (Surgery) e-mail to CEO<br />
“We have recently had a minor problem<br />
with a locum anaesthetist but it was very<br />
rapidly dealt with <strong>and</strong> so I don’t think we<br />
have anything to be concerned about.”<br />
26 March 2000 Dr Lucas’ employment ceased<br />
1 May 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> patient notification date<br />
9 May 2000 CEO advised that Dr Lucas had re-used<br />
syringes<br />
9 May 2000 File note, Chapman Tripp contacted<br />
17 May 2000 Audit Committee briefed<br />
23 May 2000 Legal advice provided by e-mail<br />
23 May 2000 Board of Directors briefed at meeting.<br />
Dr Lucas’ explanation<br />
3.5 Dr Lucas described his practice as follows:<br />
“My practice was to refill the rather expensive propofol <strong>and</strong> rocuronium<br />
syringes <strong>and</strong> re-use them. The injection site I would use was either of<br />
the two on the administration IV set. The type of intravenous cannula<br />
that is used at <strong>Gisborne</strong> has an injection site integral to the cannula but I<br />
preferred not to use that one, its being too close to the patient. Within a<br />
week (perhaps two) of starting, Dr Carstens approached me <strong>and</strong> told me<br />
that the practice was considered subst<strong>and</strong>ard at <strong>Gisborne</strong>. I subsequently<br />
stopped the practice with only very rare subsequent lapses as I changed<br />
my habit after 26 years of practice in Canada.”<br />
3.6 Dr Bruce Duncan, as acting Medical Director <strong>and</strong> then Clinical Director<br />
(Public <strong>Health</strong>), who investigated Dr Lucas’ practice of re-use in May 2000<br />
for THL, summarised a telephone call with Dr Lucas. The following is an<br />
excerpt from an agreed summary of that telephone conversation:<br />
74