08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

7 December 1999 Incident report reviewed by Clinical<br />

Director (Surgery)<br />

16 March 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> issue reported on TVOne news<br />

17 March 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> issue reported in NZ Herald<br />

17 March 2000 E-mail from Northl<strong>and</strong> CEO re “anaesthetic<br />

issue” (this alluded to previous media story):<br />

“We have a problem with one of our<br />

anaesthetists. My initial enquiries have<br />

disclosed some interesting facts which I am<br />

told are common practices in this country.<br />

No-one counter checks …. Although many<br />

things are counted <strong>and</strong> recounted in theatre,<br />

syringes are not.”<br />

CEO e-mail query to Theatre Manager,<br />

Clinical Director (Surgery) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong><br />

Manager re “What is our practice? Do we<br />

have a similar risk?”<br />

Clinical Director (Surgery) e-mail to CEO<br />

“We have recently had a minor problem<br />

with a locum anaesthetist but it was very<br />

rapidly dealt with <strong>and</strong> so I don’t think we<br />

have anything to be concerned about.”<br />

26 March 2000 Dr Lucas’ employment ceased<br />

1 May 2000 Northl<strong>and</strong> patient notification date<br />

9 May 2000 CEO advised that Dr Lucas had re-used<br />

syringes<br />

9 May 2000 File note, Chapman Tripp contacted<br />

17 May 2000 Audit Committee briefed<br />

23 May 2000 Legal advice provided by e-mail<br />

23 May 2000 Board of Directors briefed at meeting.<br />

Dr Lucas’ explanation<br />

3.5 Dr Lucas described his practice as follows:<br />

“My practice was to refill the rather expensive propofol <strong>and</strong> rocuronium<br />

syringes <strong>and</strong> re-use them. The injection site I would use was either of<br />

the two on the administration IV set. The type of intravenous cannula<br />

that is used at <strong>Gisborne</strong> has an injection site integral to the cannula but I<br />

preferred not to use that one, its being too close to the patient. Within a<br />

week (perhaps two) of starting, Dr Carstens approached me <strong>and</strong> told me<br />

that the practice was considered subst<strong>and</strong>ard at <strong>Gisborne</strong>. I subsequently<br />

stopped the practice with only very rare subsequent lapses as I changed<br />

my habit after 26 years of practice in Canada.”<br />

3.6 Dr Bruce Duncan, as acting Medical Director <strong>and</strong> then Clinical Director<br />

(Public <strong>Health</strong>), who investigated Dr Lucas’ practice of re-use in May 2000<br />

for THL, summarised a telephone call with Dr Lucas. The following is an<br />

excerpt from an agreed summary of that telephone conversation:<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!