08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ing of staff concerns <strong>and</strong> initial management action<br />

3.11 In the first week of Dr Lucas’ employment a dental list went over time. Dr<br />

Lucas thought the fault lay with an anaesthetic technician because she had<br />

been throwing out his used syringes. The anaesthetic technician mentioned the<br />

incident to the Charge Anaesthetic Technician <strong>and</strong> reported filling out an<br />

incident form about the re-use of syringes. A witness saw the technician fill<br />

out an incident form <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> it in, but the form was apparently lost. Some<br />

senior clinicians <strong>and</strong> managers questioned whether the incident form was<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ed in.<br />

3.12 The Charge Anaesthetic Technician informed the Theatre Manager in October<br />

1999 on the Manager’s return from leave that Dr Lucas was re-using “single<br />

use” syringes. The Theatre Manager, who was on leave, when Dr Lucas<br />

started work, informed the Group Manager (<strong>Hospital</strong>) about the re-use of<br />

syringes issue in writing. She also reported speaking to the Quality Coordinator<br />

about her concerns.<br />

3.13 Within the first few weeks of Dr Lucas’ employment the Head of Department<br />

(Anaesthesia) was told by the Theatre Manager that Dr Lucas was re-using<br />

syringes. The Head of Department took Dr Lucas aside <strong>and</strong> told him “it was<br />

an absolute no-no”. He also spoke to the Group Manager (<strong>Hospital</strong>) about the<br />

re-use incident <strong>and</strong> told him that he had spoken to Dr Lucas.<br />

3.14 It appears the Head of Department (Anaesthesia) acted in response to the<br />

incident in October, despite the fact that the incident form was lost. The Head<br />

of Department believed that Dr Lucas had ceased his practice of re-using<br />

syringes. He was very upset when he discovered that Dr Lucas later disobeyed<br />

his specific instructions.<br />

3.15 A further incident form relating to the re-use of syringes was completed by the<br />

Theatre Manager in November. This form is undated but was registered in the<br />

incident reporting system on 26 November 1999.<br />

3.16 The Quality Co-ordinator received this report <strong>and</strong> sent it within 24 hours to the<br />

Group Manager (<strong>Hospital</strong>) <strong>and</strong> the Clinical Director (Surgery). She was not<br />

aware that there had been an earlier report in October about this issue, because<br />

that report was mislaid <strong>and</strong> so never reached her office. After the incident was<br />

brought to their attention, the Group Manager (<strong>Hospital</strong>) <strong>and</strong> the Clinical<br />

Director (Surgery) discussed the matter.<br />

3.17 The Clinical Director (Surgery) delegated the matter to the Head of<br />

Department (Anaesthesia) because he was concerned that Dr Lucas was close<br />

to leaving due to the criticisms levelled at him <strong>and</strong> thought that his<br />

involvement might precipitate a resignation. He was concerned at the<br />

possibility of losing Dr Lucas with the approaching millennium. In his view<br />

“the issue of re-use of syringes was about anaesthetic technique”. Dr Lucas<br />

responded that he did not consider resigning <strong>and</strong> gave no indication that he<br />

would do so.<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!