Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Operating Theatre Protocols<br />
Appropriate st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />
4.15 THL’s policy on sharps disposal includes the statement:<br />
“3. Whenever sharps are used, approved sharps containers will be<br />
available for disposal.<br />
4. The original sharps user is to dispose of it at its point of use in an<br />
approved sharps container.”<br />
The policy on the treatment of used items at THL is: “When h<strong>and</strong>ling used<br />
items universal precautions shall be followed at all stages of h<strong>and</strong>ling to<br />
prevent exposure to blood <strong>and</strong> body substances.” Under universal precautions<br />
it is recommended that all health care workers take precautions to prevent<br />
injuries caused by needles, scalpels, <strong>and</strong> other sharp instruments or devices.<br />
The policy states: “All single use items should be discarded appropriately after<br />
use according to local regulations”.<br />
Opinion<br />
4.16 Although the allegation was sensationalised <strong>and</strong> some of the people involved<br />
did not like Dr Lucas, there is evidence that Dr Lucas did not follow THL’s<br />
policy on sharps disposal. Specifically, he failed to dispose of sharps in an<br />
approved sharps container or temporarily place them in a suitable alternative<br />
receptacle.<br />
4.17 In my opinion, by failing to comply with a “relevant st<strong>and</strong>ard” Dr Lucas<br />
breached Right 4(2) of the Code.<br />
5. RIPPING OR CUTTING PATIENTS’ GOWNS<br />
The alleged incidents<br />
5.1 Dr Lucas was alleged to have failed to treat consumers with respect <strong>and</strong><br />
provide services in a manner that respected the dignity of individuals, by<br />
ripping or cutting off patients’ gowns <strong>and</strong> objecting, between anaesthetic<br />
procedures, to nurses or technicians covering women’s breasts after their<br />
gowns had been removed.<br />
5.2 In the letter to the Minister, NZNO noted that Dr Lucas “had a practice of<br />
ripping or cutting gowns off patients, invariably [those of] women”.<br />
5.3 The Head of Department (Anaesthesia) advised the investigation team that<br />
maternity patients came to theatre with gowns wrapped round them, not<br />
operating gowns with the usual split up the back. The gowns needed to be<br />
pulled up to gain access to insert the epidural <strong>and</strong> to tape tubing on patients’<br />
backs. Dr Lucas wanted patients to wear the st<strong>and</strong>ard operating gowns to<br />
prevent all the tugging <strong>and</strong> pulling of the wrap-around gowns. “It was difficult<br />
to turn patients on the narrow bed, <strong>and</strong> it is far better to have a clearer view<br />
when inserting an epidural. It is better for the patient.” It was the way Dr<br />
Lucas did this that was said to create conflict <strong>and</strong> a tense atmosphere.<br />
87