08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

PSA Testing Procedures<br />

involved meant that most senior staff were often not available during the day.”<br />

Mr Grant wrote that the “combined on-call <strong>and</strong> call back cost was close to<br />

$150,000” per annum.<br />

5.9 THL advised the investigation team that the staff count in July 2000 was 15.6<br />

FTEs <strong>and</strong> in December 2000 17.6 FTEs. Since November 2000 two qualified<br />

<strong>and</strong> two unqualified staff have resigned. The 17.6 staff members include four<br />

laboratory assistants who have been employed “in an effort to overcome staff<br />

shortages”. THL is currently talking to a number of qualified prospective<br />

employees.<br />

5.10 A locum technician explained how staffing levels impact on the on-call roster.<br />

Because the laboratory had insufficient staff to operate adequately 24 hours a<br />

day, staff had to be on-call on a regular basis. Contractual arrangements<br />

govern the length of breaks between callbacks, <strong>and</strong> it is common for someone<br />

to be absent as the direct result of a series of calls during the night. The cost<br />

of call-outs for the period 1/2/2000 to 31/7/2000 totalled $54,316. This<br />

equates to $108,632 per annum.<br />

5.11 Mr John Sharman (consultant biochemist, <strong>and</strong> presently acting Laboratory<br />

Manager) wrote a special report on staffing (31 July 2000). His comments on<br />

biochemistry staffing were:<br />

“The section head position is vacant <strong>and</strong> needs to be filled as a matter of<br />

urgency. It is imperative that the person appointed be scrutinised<br />

carefully to ensure that the required skills are present <strong>and</strong> that<br />

competence to do the job can be established.”<br />

5.12 The nominal level of biochemistry staff assisting the section head was 2.5<br />

FTEs. This is made up of two technologists in 1.5 FTE positions <strong>and</strong> a<br />

laboratory assistant occupying a 1 FTE position but seconded for half of his<br />

time to microbiology for training <strong>and</strong> to cover a staffing shortfall there. The<br />

section needs sufficient staff to carry out the routine work while releasing the<br />

section head to carry out essential background tasks. These tasks include:<br />

implementation <strong>and</strong> maintenance of quality control processes, staff training<br />

<strong>and</strong> education, review <strong>and</strong> maintenance of manuals, <strong>and</strong> cover for leave.<br />

5.13 The 1998 IANZ Accreditation <strong>Report</strong> commented that there were insufficient<br />

staff. This situation went unremedied.<br />

Accreditation history<br />

5.14 As a result of an IANZ routine assessment, in late 1998, the biochemistry<br />

section accreditation was suspended in November 1998. The Laboratory<br />

Manager advised the investigation team that the accreditation was lost for the<br />

following reasons: there were no records of when quality controls were made<br />

on the analysers; samples were being sent out of the Laboratory before they<br />

were ready; <strong>and</strong> work was going out on uncontrolled samples/specimens. The<br />

report stated that the decision to suspend registration did not reflect on the<br />

personal abilities of individual staff working in Clinical Biochemistry.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!