08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

this. The Group Manager had previously discussed this with Dr Lucas<br />

who had logical reasons for preferring this.<br />

The Group Manager does not recall whether the application of ice on<br />

this same patient was also discussed at this time, though it may have<br />

been. Dr Lucas was known to use ice on patients <strong>and</strong> this had been<br />

investigated at this stage.<br />

After discussing the gynaecology patient above, the staff informed the<br />

Group Manager about the occasion on the preceding weekend involving<br />

the induction of anaesthesia on the child, referred to in [paras 9.5 <strong>and</strong><br />

9.6]. Considerable time was spent discussing this.<br />

The matter raised in [para 13.13], also occurred at this same meeting.<br />

Two of the anaesthetic staff <strong>and</strong> the theatre nurse involved above stated<br />

that they did not want to work with Dr Lucas any more. While the<br />

Group Manager cannot recall his exact choice of words – or those of the<br />

staff – it was noted by those present that there were only a matter of<br />

weeks left before Dr Lucas was to leave. It was also noted that staff<br />

could not refuse to provide a service simply because they disliked<br />

another staff member. However, it was agreed to examine the theatre<br />

roster to see if it might be arranged for those staff who did not want to<br />

work with Dr Lucas might be able to be accommodated in this for the<br />

remaining period. The theatre manager agreed to arrange this, if<br />

possible. This occurred for the nurse, but when this arrangement was<br />

subsequently offered to the anaesthetic technician who worked with him<br />

mostly, she declined the offer <strong>and</strong> agreed to continue working with him.”<br />

Appropriate st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

13.15 I am advised that there are no directly relevant st<strong>and</strong>ards. The depth of<br />

anaesthesia is difficult to define “because anaesthetists have approached the<br />

issue in terms of the drugs available to them rather than the patient’s needs<br />

during surgery. The loss of consciousness is considered a threshold or all-ornone<br />

(quantal) phenomenon. By this definition, there can be no degrees of<br />

anaesthesia or any variable depth of anaesthesia. The definitions of<br />

anaesthesia depth have evolved with the drugs used in clinical practice. The<br />

use of potent inhaled anaesthetics, opioids, <strong>and</strong> intravenous anaesthetics in<br />

modern clinical practice has precluded simple unifying definitions .…”<br />

(Miller, RD, Miller’s Textbook of Anaesthesia. Churchill Livingston, 5 th ed,<br />

NY, 2000)<br />

Opinion<br />

13.16 My expert anaesthetic advisor noted that there is a difference between: (1)<br />

“wakening” <strong>and</strong> other signs of lighter anaesthesia, such as coughing, <strong>and</strong> (2)<br />

“wakefulness” in the context of general anaesthesia <strong>and</strong> when associated<br />

with regional anaesthesia. The advisor did note that “Dr Lucas seems to have<br />

a slightly extreme view of when to lighten anaesthesia based on a<br />

preoccupation with efficiency”.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!