08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

Ensuring that the patient remains in the recovery facility until safe for<br />

discharge to a ward. Where transfer to an intensive care unit or high<br />

dependency unit is necessary, responsibility for care remains with the<br />

anaesthetist until this transfer is complete.<br />

2.4 Ensuring that there will be adequate post-operative care of the<br />

patient after discharge from the recovery area.”<br />

14.15 I received the following advice from my expert anaesthetist:<br />

“Except in case of emergency, as when a cardiac arrest has occurred, the<br />

anaesthetist should never leave an anaesthetised patient in theatre in the<br />

care of anyone other than another anaesthetist <strong>and</strong> then only after a<br />

h<strong>and</strong>over. In such circumstances it would be more usual for the second<br />

anaesthetist to attend the emergency.<br />

The cause of post partum haemorrhage is usually managed by surgical<br />

staff although if they were not contactable the anaesthetist would be<br />

expected to advise on management. Until such time as ‘definitive’<br />

treatment of the cause was possible the anaesthetist would be expected to<br />

ensure cardiovascular stability. In the scenario described either the<br />

medicines chart would need to be taken to the theatre for the anaesthetist<br />

to prescribe treatment, or a verbal order would have to be accepted by<br />

the recovery nurse.<br />

The description of ‘football’ sized clots is questionable.<br />

Once again the case illustrates the antipathy that appears to have existed<br />

between Dr Lucas <strong>and</strong> nursing staff.”<br />

Opinion<br />

14.16 I am satisfied, on the basis of the expert anaesthetic advice that I have<br />

received, that Dr Lucas did not inappropriately refuse to attend a patient in<br />

recovery following a Caesarean section. In my opinion Dr Lucas complied<br />

with professional st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> did not breach Right 4(2) of the Code.<br />

15. INCIDENT REPORTING<br />

15.1 For general comments on incident reporting, <strong>and</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>ling of incidents<br />

not relating to Dr Lucas, see chapter 3.<br />

15.2 Theatre incident reports were channelled through the Theatre Manager using<br />

the hospital’s st<strong>and</strong>ard incident form. There was no designated place in the<br />

Theatre Manager’s office to place a completed form. A number of forms<br />

were lost. Witnesses saw incident forms completed <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ed in but the<br />

Theatre Manager, Group Manager (<strong>Hospital</strong>) <strong>and</strong> Quality Co-ordinator<br />

subsequently had no record of receiving these forms. Other incident forms<br />

were received but were ignored or remained unresolved.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!