Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Operating Theatre Protocols<br />
shock. He considered that she had had a reaction. He believed that he would<br />
help her if he could prove to her that she was not allergic to fentanyl. He said<br />
he was motivated by the prospect of restoring to this patient “the availability<br />
of a very useful narcotic <strong>and</strong> at the same time dispelling a delusion about<br />
allergy that was terrifying her”.<br />
The surgeon’s view<br />
8.21 The patient’s surgeon, Dr Ian Burton, thought that it had been explained to the<br />
patient outside the theatre that fentanyl would be used. “She may have been<br />
so frightened that she would suffer a significant reaction that it was difficult to<br />
determine whether consent was informed.” Dr Burton stated that if he had<br />
honestly thought that the patient would suffer an anaphylactic reaction, then he<br />
would have cautioned Dr Lucas against using fentanyl. Dr Lucas said he does<br />
not know how Dr Burton could have known he was going to use fentanyl. He<br />
had discussed it with the patient, <strong>and</strong> no one else, until afterwards.<br />
8.22 The surgeon said that he admired Dr Lucas for taking such a courageous step<br />
<strong>and</strong> testing the patient’s response to the drug. The surgeon carefully reviewed<br />
the notes <strong>and</strong> listened to the anaesthetist. He was satisfied that Dr Lucas was<br />
not taking an unnecessary risk.<br />
8.23 The surgeon described being almost able to “feel the antagonism of the<br />
nursing staff present at the operation”.<br />
The records <strong>and</strong> pre-anaesthetic checks<br />
8.24 The undated pre-anaesthetic record for this patient is described in para 8.5. It<br />
recorded the fentanyl allergy <strong>and</strong> adds under the heading “Other” “description<br />
of allergy that of simple overdose in patient without IV fluids’”, <strong>and</strong> notes<br />
under the “Plan” “Give fentanyl under controlled conditions to R/O [rule out]<br />
allergy …”. The h<strong>and</strong>writing on this form appears to be that of Dr Lucas.<br />
8.25 While at THL, Dr Lucas stated that he did “quite a bit of the pre-anaesthetic<br />
clinic work”. He continued:<br />
“Consent was not an issue at the pre-anaesthetic clinic because I was<br />
assessing people <strong>and</strong> checking out their health pre-anaesthetic. I was not<br />
determining or doing informed consent at a pre-anaesthetic clinic. I<br />
pointed out to patients at pre-anaesthetic clinic that I would not<br />
necessarily be the one who was going to give them their anaesthetic<br />
before their surgery.”<br />
8.26 A colleague made the following observations about the pre-anaesthetic clinic<br />
Dr Lucas worked in every Monday:<br />
“He dealt with the difficult <strong>and</strong> complex cases <strong>and</strong> gave a detailed<br />
excellent report on each patient <strong>and</strong> was extremely helpful. I am sorry<br />
that this is not continued anymore .… For every consultation done by<br />
Dr Lucas there was usually at least one page of history, examination <strong>and</strong><br />
105