08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

shock. He considered that she had had a reaction. He believed that he would<br />

help her if he could prove to her that she was not allergic to fentanyl. He said<br />

he was motivated by the prospect of restoring to this patient “the availability<br />

of a very useful narcotic <strong>and</strong> at the same time dispelling a delusion about<br />

allergy that was terrifying her”.<br />

The surgeon’s view<br />

8.21 The patient’s surgeon, Dr Ian Burton, thought that it had been explained to the<br />

patient outside the theatre that fentanyl would be used. “She may have been<br />

so frightened that she would suffer a significant reaction that it was difficult to<br />

determine whether consent was informed.” Dr Burton stated that if he had<br />

honestly thought that the patient would suffer an anaphylactic reaction, then he<br />

would have cautioned Dr Lucas against using fentanyl. Dr Lucas said he does<br />

not know how Dr Burton could have known he was going to use fentanyl. He<br />

had discussed it with the patient, <strong>and</strong> no one else, until afterwards.<br />

8.22 The surgeon said that he admired Dr Lucas for taking such a courageous step<br />

<strong>and</strong> testing the patient’s response to the drug. The surgeon carefully reviewed<br />

the notes <strong>and</strong> listened to the anaesthetist. He was satisfied that Dr Lucas was<br />

not taking an unnecessary risk.<br />

8.23 The surgeon described being almost able to “feel the antagonism of the<br />

nursing staff present at the operation”.<br />

The records <strong>and</strong> pre-anaesthetic checks<br />

8.24 The undated pre-anaesthetic record for this patient is described in para 8.5. It<br />

recorded the fentanyl allergy <strong>and</strong> adds under the heading “Other” “description<br />

of allergy that of simple overdose in patient without IV fluids’”, <strong>and</strong> notes<br />

under the “Plan” “Give fentanyl under controlled conditions to R/O [rule out]<br />

allergy …”. The h<strong>and</strong>writing on this form appears to be that of Dr Lucas.<br />

8.25 While at THL, Dr Lucas stated that he did “quite a bit of the pre-anaesthetic<br />

clinic work”. He continued:<br />

“Consent was not an issue at the pre-anaesthetic clinic because I was<br />

assessing people <strong>and</strong> checking out their health pre-anaesthetic. I was not<br />

determining or doing informed consent at a pre-anaesthetic clinic. I<br />

pointed out to patients at pre-anaesthetic clinic that I would not<br />

necessarily be the one who was going to give them their anaesthetic<br />

before their surgery.”<br />

8.26 A colleague made the following observations about the pre-anaesthetic clinic<br />

Dr Lucas worked in every Monday:<br />

“He dealt with the difficult <strong>and</strong> complex cases <strong>and</strong> gave a detailed<br />

excellent report on each patient <strong>and</strong> was extremely helpful. I am sorry<br />

that this is not continued anymore .… For every consultation done by<br />

Dr Lucas there was usually at least one page of history, examination <strong>and</strong><br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!