08.01.2014 Views

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />

Operating Theatre Protocols<br />

opened to allow application of ECG electrodes or administration of spinal or<br />

epidural anaesthesia.”<br />

5.19 THL has no documented policy on the use of gowns.<br />

Opinion<br />

5.20 I accept the advice of my expert clinical advisors that access to a patient’s<br />

lower back for spinal anaesthesia is essential for good practice. Although, to a<br />

lay person, the notion that the anaesthetist might cut or rip open the back of a<br />

theatre gown is surprising, I accept that Dr Lucas’ decision to cut gowns open,<br />

<strong>and</strong> his manner of doing so, was consistent with professional st<strong>and</strong>ards. I note<br />

in passing that no patient who ever experienced Dr Lucas cutting the back of<br />

her gown in theatre made a complaint. Whatever the disquiet of some of Dr<br />

Lucas’ colleagues, who were concerned about patient dignity, the patients<br />

themselves do not appear to have voiced any concerns.<br />

5.21 Accordingly, in my opinion Dr Lucas did not breach Right 4(2) of the Code in<br />

relation to this matter.<br />

6. INAPPROPRIATE USE OF ICE<br />

The alleged incidents<br />

6.1 The manner in which Dr Lucas used ice to check the level of anaesthetic block<br />

was alleged to have been inappropriate. In particular, it was alleged that ice<br />

cubes were rubbed over women’s nipples until the cubes melted <strong>and</strong> until after<br />

the patients had confirmed they had no feeling above the relevant area.<br />

6.2 The investigation team gathered first-h<strong>and</strong> evidence of Dr Lucas’ use of ice<br />

from two nurses, four anaesthetic technicians, a surgeon <strong>and</strong> a patient. Apart<br />

from one nurse, those who recorded incidents in writing relating to Dr Lucas’<br />

use of ice had not personally seen him using ice, but were recording concerns<br />

they had heard from witnesses.<br />

6.3 An anaesthetic technician reported to the investigation team what she had seen<br />

in relation to a patient who was having an epidural steroid:<br />

“The patient was on her back, <strong>and</strong> had already been given the epidural<br />

steroid. The patient had a gown on <strong>and</strong> Dr Lucas started rubbing ice<br />

down the patient’s side to the groin area <strong>and</strong> he did it over <strong>and</strong> over.<br />

[The anaesthetic technician] went <strong>and</strong> got another technician, to see what<br />

the other technician thought of it, because [she] had never seen ice used<br />

in this way before. The other technician had seen ice used before, but<br />

not to that extent. The epidural steroid patient had had back <strong>and</strong> leg pain<br />

<strong>and</strong> she had received an injection of corticoid steroid. Dr Lucas<br />

explained that he was checking how far the epidural block had gone up.<br />

[The technician] was concerned about the length of time that it took Dr<br />

Lucas to test the epidural block with the ice because the patient was<br />

getting cold <strong>and</strong> Dr Lucas only did one side with the ice. Dr Lucas went<br />

down the left side of the patient, down the side of the nipple, down to the<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!