Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Gisborne Hospital Report - Health and Disability Commissioner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gisborne</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> 1999 – 2000<br />
Operating Theatre Protocols<br />
opened to allow application of ECG electrodes or administration of spinal or<br />
epidural anaesthesia.”<br />
5.19 THL has no documented policy on the use of gowns.<br />
Opinion<br />
5.20 I accept the advice of my expert clinical advisors that access to a patient’s<br />
lower back for spinal anaesthesia is essential for good practice. Although, to a<br />
lay person, the notion that the anaesthetist might cut or rip open the back of a<br />
theatre gown is surprising, I accept that Dr Lucas’ decision to cut gowns open,<br />
<strong>and</strong> his manner of doing so, was consistent with professional st<strong>and</strong>ards. I note<br />
in passing that no patient who ever experienced Dr Lucas cutting the back of<br />
her gown in theatre made a complaint. Whatever the disquiet of some of Dr<br />
Lucas’ colleagues, who were concerned about patient dignity, the patients<br />
themselves do not appear to have voiced any concerns.<br />
5.21 Accordingly, in my opinion Dr Lucas did not breach Right 4(2) of the Code in<br />
relation to this matter.<br />
6. INAPPROPRIATE USE OF ICE<br />
The alleged incidents<br />
6.1 The manner in which Dr Lucas used ice to check the level of anaesthetic block<br />
was alleged to have been inappropriate. In particular, it was alleged that ice<br />
cubes were rubbed over women’s nipples until the cubes melted <strong>and</strong> until after<br />
the patients had confirmed they had no feeling above the relevant area.<br />
6.2 The investigation team gathered first-h<strong>and</strong> evidence of Dr Lucas’ use of ice<br />
from two nurses, four anaesthetic technicians, a surgeon <strong>and</strong> a patient. Apart<br />
from one nurse, those who recorded incidents in writing relating to Dr Lucas’<br />
use of ice had not personally seen him using ice, but were recording concerns<br />
they had heard from witnesses.<br />
6.3 An anaesthetic technician reported to the investigation team what she had seen<br />
in relation to a patient who was having an epidural steroid:<br />
“The patient was on her back, <strong>and</strong> had already been given the epidural<br />
steroid. The patient had a gown on <strong>and</strong> Dr Lucas started rubbing ice<br />
down the patient’s side to the groin area <strong>and</strong> he did it over <strong>and</strong> over.<br />
[The anaesthetic technician] went <strong>and</strong> got another technician, to see what<br />
the other technician thought of it, because [she] had never seen ice used<br />
in this way before. The other technician had seen ice used before, but<br />
not to that extent. The epidural steroid patient had had back <strong>and</strong> leg pain<br />
<strong>and</strong> she had received an injection of corticoid steroid. Dr Lucas<br />
explained that he was checking how far the epidural block had gone up.<br />
[The technician] was concerned about the length of time that it took Dr<br />
Lucas to test the epidural block with the ice because the patient was<br />
getting cold <strong>and</strong> Dr Lucas only did one side with the ice. Dr Lucas went<br />
down the left side of the patient, down the side of the nipple, down to the<br />
90