27.10.2012 Views

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

studies. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Promoti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s do not lead primarily to a reallocati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current expenditures by<br />

households across items within a category.<br />

But, the decompositi<strong>on</strong> dealt with thus far assumes that c<strong>on</strong>sumers first decide when<br />

to buy and then what and how much. The focal point was whether a promoti<strong>on</strong> resulted in a<br />

change in interpurchase time or not. Is it realistic to assume that c<strong>on</strong>sumers first decide when<br />

to buy when performing across product category research? A c<strong>on</strong>sumer does not visit a store<br />

for each product category separately. Normally, purchases are made within more than <strong>on</strong>e<br />

product category during <strong>on</strong>e and the same shopping trip. When a c<strong>on</strong>sumer is shopping, he or<br />

she may run into a promoti<strong>on</strong> for a product category from which he or she did not intend to<br />

buy, where the promoti<strong>on</strong> is for a n<strong>on</strong>-favorite brand. This can result in accelerated n<strong>on</strong>favorite<br />

brand purchases. Are these accelerated purchases mainly due to a change in purchase<br />

timing or due to a brand switch? Van Heerde et al. (2001) assigned these accelerated<br />

purchases to a change in purchase timing, as the increase in own-brand sales cannot be<br />

assigned to current cross-brand effects. But, isn’t more logical to assign these increased unit<br />

sales to brand switching instead <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a change in purchase timing? When assigning the entire<br />

effect to brand switching, an upper limit is obtained for the brand switch effect, whereas the<br />

assignment procedure followed before provides a lower limit for the brand switch effect. The<br />

effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> combined resp<strong>on</strong>ses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> changes in purchase timing and brand choice is assigned to<br />

brand switching instead <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> purchase timing, as depicted in Figure 8.3. The focal point in this<br />

approach is whether current promoti<strong>on</strong>al unit sales come from regular c<strong>on</strong>sumers (c<strong>on</strong>sumers<br />

that also buy the brand when it is not <strong>on</strong> promoti<strong>on</strong>) or from n<strong>on</strong>-regular c<strong>on</strong>sumers<br />

(c<strong>on</strong>sumers who switched to the promoted brand). A manufacturer is not so much interested in<br />

drawing purchases from other shopping trips. A manufacturer is interested in the ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

sales promoti<strong>on</strong>s to draw c<strong>on</strong>sumers from competitive brands.<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!