27.10.2012 Views

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3.1 Store Loyalty<br />

Store loyalty should be negatively related with out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-store promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se, because<br />

these promoti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten require store switching (Bawa and Shoemaker 1987). There is<br />

evidence that store loyal people are less price sensitive (Bucklin and Lattin 1991, Kim et<br />

al. 1999), thus also suggesting a negative relati<strong>on</strong>ship. Table 3.9 shows a summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prior<br />

empirical findings regarding the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between store loyalty and promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se.<br />

We hypothesize that store loyalty and promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se are negatively related.<br />

Table 3.9: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies relating store loyalty with promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

64<br />

Sign Relati<strong>on</strong>ship Study<br />

+ Sirohi et al. (1998)<br />

- Bawa and Shoemaker (1978)<br />

Kim et al. (1999)<br />

Hypothesis H11: Store loyalty and promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se are negatively<br />

related.<br />

H11a: Store loyalty and promoti<strong>on</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se are negatively<br />

related, especially for out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-store promoti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

3.3.2 Basket Size<br />

On a given trip, the large basket shopper purchases in many product categories, and therefore<br />

fulfills a relatively large percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his total needs <strong>on</strong> a single visit. This implies that out<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-store<br />

promoti<strong>on</strong>s for a wide array <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> categories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fer good opportunities to save m<strong>on</strong>ey.<br />

But these shoppers lack flexibility to take advantage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> occasi<strong>on</strong>al price deals (Bell and Lattin<br />

1998). Small basket size shoppers, <strong>on</strong> the other hand, can benefit from price variati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

store. The total c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> needs are divided into many smaller baskets. Buying more<br />

categories when the prices are relatively low, and deferring purchases when prices are high.<br />

This seems to indicate that large basket shoppers are more focused <strong>on</strong> out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-store sales<br />

promoti<strong>on</strong>s, whereas small basket shoppers are more resp<strong>on</strong>sive towards in-store promoti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!