27.10.2012 Views

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

involvement purchases for most c<strong>on</strong>sumers. Once inside a store, a c<strong>on</strong>sumer can still switch<br />

brands.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sumers may patr<strong>on</strong>ize different stores for different reas<strong>on</strong>s (Popkowski and<br />

Timmermans 1997). The basket <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods that they need to buy <strong>on</strong> the shopping trip may<br />

influence their store-choice behavior in that certain stores may not <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fer all the goods they<br />

need to buy. Price-sensitive and promoti<strong>on</strong>-sensitive c<strong>on</strong>sumers are likely to shop at different<br />

stores to pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it from the lowest prices at the various stores. The literature has also made a<br />

distincti<strong>on</strong> between fill-in trips and regular trips. The c<strong>on</strong>sumers may make fill-in trips to a<br />

smaller, nearby store, while making regular trips to a different store.<br />

Kumar and Le<strong>on</strong>e (1988) found statistically significant cross-store effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sales promoti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

for diapers (that is, when <strong>on</strong>e store decreases its price, a competing store would have lower<br />

sales). Walters and MacKenzie (1988), however, found little associati<strong>on</strong> between store traffic<br />

and the particular product category promoted as a loss leader (loss leaders are products<br />

temporarily priced at or below retailer cost). Locati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venience and overall price<br />

percepti<strong>on</strong>s seemed to be more important determinants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> patr<strong>on</strong>age than were weekly<br />

specials.<br />

To summarize, sales promoti<strong>on</strong>s seem to influence store choice behavior <strong>on</strong>ly to a<br />

modest degree.<br />

4.2.3 <strong>Purchase</strong> Accelerati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>Purchase</strong> accelerati<strong>on</strong> means that a c<strong>on</strong>sumer’s purchase timing or purchase quantity is<br />

influenced by promoti<strong>on</strong> activities. One possible c<strong>on</strong>sequence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> purchase accelerati<strong>on</strong> is that<br />

it shifts purchases forward that would have occurred anyway. Other effects can take place,<br />

however. <strong>Purchase</strong> time and/or quantity accelerati<strong>on</strong> can prevent switching from the<br />

manufacturer’s brand. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Promoti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s can also lead to “decelerated” purchase timing, because<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers learn in advance or anticipate that a promoti<strong>on</strong> will occur and wait for the event.<br />

The ec<strong>on</strong>omic theory as developed by Blattberg et al. (1981) provides <strong>on</strong>e<br />

explanati<strong>on</strong> for purchase accelerati<strong>on</strong> and for differences between households. The c<strong>on</strong>sumer<br />

wants to minimize the costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> satisfying his or her household’s demand for the product. By<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!