27.10.2012 Views

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

Analysis of Sales Promotion Effects on Household Purchase Behavior

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

compared to a perceived benchmark – a reference price – and that comparis<strong>on</strong> yields<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumer percepti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> saving. The general noti<strong>on</strong> is that c<strong>on</strong>sumer judgments are made<br />

relative to some base case. This noti<strong>on</strong> is the foundati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prospect theory (Kahneman and<br />

Tversky 1979). Prospect theory proposes that c<strong>on</strong>sumer decisi<strong>on</strong>s are based <strong>on</strong> how they<br />

value the potential gains or losses. Applying prospect theory in the c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prices,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumers would compare the observed point-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-purchase price with the reference price.<br />

An unanticipated n<strong>on</strong>zero difference would affect purchase probabilities for brands, with<br />

losses having greater effect <strong>on</strong> purchase probabilities than equally sized gains.<br />

Kalwani and Yim (1992) empirically revealed that different price promoti<strong>on</strong><br />

schedules have different impacts <strong>on</strong> brands’ expected prices. Mayhew and Winer (1992)<br />

tested the hypotheses that both internal (prices stored in memory <strong>on</strong> the basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

percepti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> actual, fair, or other price c<strong>on</strong>cepts) and external reference prices (provided<br />

by observed stimuli in the purchase envir<strong>on</strong>ment, i.e. shelf tags c<strong>on</strong>taining informati<strong>on</strong><br />

about the suggested retail price) will influence the probability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> purchase.<br />

2.3.3.3 Attitude Models<br />

Attitude models specify the link between c<strong>on</strong>sumer beliefs and behavior (e.g., Fishbein and<br />

Ajzen 1975). We menti<strong>on</strong> just a small number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> complex processes identified in these<br />

attitude models. The c<strong>on</strong>sumer decisi<strong>on</strong> process (CDP) as described in these types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

models comprise <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> several interacting, complex processes taking place within the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumer (therefore falling within the category <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> stimulus-organism-resp<strong>on</strong>se models).<br />

Although attitude models and ec<strong>on</strong>omic utility arise from very different theoretical bases,<br />

attitude models are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten indistinguishable from ec<strong>on</strong>omic utility theory (both assuming<br />

rati<strong>on</strong>ality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumer decisi<strong>on</strong>-making). One distinctive characteristic <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> attitude models,<br />

however, is the explicit attenti<strong>on</strong> to views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> relevant others. This is a factor generally<br />

unrelated to the intrinsic utility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the product. A sec<strong>on</strong>d philosophical difference between<br />

attitude models and ec<strong>on</strong>omic utility models is that in the former, price is c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be<br />

another attribute, no different from quality, reliability, or effectiveness, whereas in<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic models, price is given an explicit role in a budget c<strong>on</strong>straint and seen as a critical<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!