04.03.2014 Views

PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management

PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management

PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Refreshing Incoherence in Neoclassical Economic Theory<br />

Research<br />

Community: According to Marxists, capitalism<br />

promotes pr<strong>of</strong>its without any concern for developing people. If<br />

the capital and infrastructure <strong>of</strong> a community is aging, capital will<br />

decide to move away without any concern for the lives <strong>of</strong><br />

community workers. People are unessential and communities are<br />

ignored. Relations destroy but goods are produced and<br />

worshipped. It makes sense, therefore, to develop a system that<br />

places higher weight on developing people and promoting strong<br />

communities.<br />

However, the serious problem for Marxists lies in<br />

maintaining the social planning along with the individual freedom,<br />

the ultimate end to be achieved by Marx:<br />

“…in communist society, where nobody has<br />

exclusive sphere <strong>of</strong> activity but each can become<br />

accomplished in any branch he wishes, society<br />

regulates the general production and thus makes it<br />

possible for me to do<br />

one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in<br />

the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the<br />

evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have mind,<br />

without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman<br />

or critic” [Marx and Engel (1967), p. 54]<br />

This passage contains two crucial facts [Carter (1988)]:<br />

(i) it is the individual who decides his/her own activity as<br />

expressed by ‘just as I have mind’, and (ii) ‘society regulates<br />

the general production’. The question is to reconcile the<br />

antagonism between (i) and (ii). 6<br />

Capitalist Defense against Marxism<br />

Marx was surely a pr<strong>of</strong>ound thinker who won legions<br />

<strong>of</strong> supporters around the world. But his predictions have not<br />

withstood the test <strong>of</strong> time. Although capitalist markets have<br />

changed over the past 150 years, competition has not devolved<br />

into monopoly. Real wages have risen and pr<strong>of</strong>it rates have not<br />

declined. Nor has a reserve army <strong>of</strong> the unemployed developed.<br />

We do have bouts with the business cycle, but more and more<br />

economists believe that significant recessions and depressions<br />

may be more the unintended result <strong>of</strong> state intervention (through<br />

6<br />

See Carter (1988) for a discussion on this issue.<br />

<strong>PAKISTAN</strong> <strong>BUSINESS</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> JULY 2011<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!