PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management
PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management
PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW - Institute of Business Management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Research<br />
Assessing the Service Quality <strong>of</strong> Some Selected Hospitals in Karachi<br />
The regression model for the Public Hospital is:<br />
Y (patients’ satisfaction) = 0.875 + 0.195 (tangibility &<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism) + 0.366 (reliability & responsiveness) +<br />
0.161 (empathy)<br />
Table 7 (Regression model for Public Hospital)<br />
Mo del R R Squ are<br />
M odel Summ ary<br />
Adjusted R<br />
Sq uare<br />
Std. E rro r <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Estimate<br />
1 .87 7 a .7 69 . 75 8 .32513<br />
a. Pred ictors: (Con stan t), e mp athy , reliability &<br />
respon siveness, tangibility & pro fession alism<br />
Mo del<br />
A NO V A b<br />
S um <strong>of</strong><br />
Sq uares<br />
d f<br />
Mean<br />
Sq uare F Sig .<br />
1 Reg res si on 21 .8 09 3 7 .27 0 68. 7<br />
7 0<br />
Res id ual 6 .55 4 62 .10 6<br />
Tot al 28 .3 64 65<br />
a. Predi ct ors : (C on st ant), emp ath y, rel iab ili ty &<br />
res po nsi ven ess, tan gib il it y & p r<strong>of</strong>ess ion ali sm<br />
b. D epend ent Variab le: pati ent s' sat isfact io n<br />
M odel<br />
Co efficients a<br />
Un standardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
B<br />
Std .<br />
Error<br />
Standardized<br />
Coefficients<br />
Beta<br />
t<br />
Sig.<br />
1 (Constant) .875 . 237 3.6 93 . 00 0<br />
tangibility<br />
&<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essiona<br />
lism<br />
reliability<br />
&<br />
respon sive<br />
ness<br />
Assuran ce<br />
& empathy<br />
.195 . 113 .208 1.7 20 . 09 0<br />
.366 . 072 .508 5.0 76 . 00 0<br />
.161 . 087 .227 1.8 54 . 06 9<br />
a. D ependent Variable: patients' satisfaction<br />
. 000<br />
a<br />
297<br />
<strong>PAKISTAN</strong> <strong>BUSINESS</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> JULY 2011