23.03.2014 Views

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />

<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />

3.6.1.4 Evaluation of historic significance<br />

36 C.F.R. § 800.4(c) requires that the agency official 1) apply the National Register criteria to<br />

properties identified in the APE, in consultation with the SHPO <strong>and</strong> federally recognized<br />

tribes that may attach religious <strong>and</strong> cultural significance, <strong>and</strong> 2) determine whether a property<br />

is eligible. The criteria, set out in 36 C.F.R. Part 63, are:<br />

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology,<br />

engineering, <strong>and</strong> culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, <strong>and</strong> objects<br />

that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling,<br />

<strong>and</strong> association <strong>and</strong><br />

(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the<br />

broad patterns of our history; or<br />

(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or<br />

(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of<br />

construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic<br />

values, or that represent a significant <strong>and</strong> distinguishable entity whose<br />

components may lack individual distinction; or<br />

(d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory<br />

or history.<br />

National Register Bulletin 38, Guidelines for Evaluating <strong>and</strong> Documenting<br />

Traditional Cultural Properties, provides further instruction on how to apply the<br />

criteria to TCPs. Examples of properties possessing such significance include (among<br />

others) locations where a community or members of a community have traditionally<br />

carried out cultural practices or beliefs important in maintaining their historic identity.<br />

3.6.1.5 Determination of eligibility<br />

FHWA applied the National Register criteria to the properties identified by SRB&A, in<br />

consultation with the SHPO <strong>and</strong> appropriate Native Alaska governments, <strong>and</strong> made the<br />

following determinations.<br />

3.6.1.5.1 The Mat-Su<br />

The field inventory <strong>and</strong> testing program found no historic properties (SRB&A 2006, Vol. I);<br />

therefore, no identified historic properties would be affected by the implementation of any<br />

alternative presented in this Draft EIS.<br />

3.6.1.5.2 Anchorage<br />

SRB&A inventoried all of the 281 properties on Government Hill (SRB&A 2006).<br />

Government Hill had two historic properties, the Brown’s Point Cottages, ANC-0048 <strong>and</strong><br />

ANC-1205, already listed in the National Register. FHWA, 33 in consultation with SHPO, has<br />

determined that there are four historic districts <strong>and</strong> six additional individual properties that<br />

are eligible for the National Register <strong>and</strong> therefore meet the criteria for protection under<br />

33 Personal communication, Edrie Vinson, letter to Judith Bittner, June 23, 2006 (see Appendix D).<br />

12/18/07 3-135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!