3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />
<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
3.6.1.4 Evaluation of historic significance<br />
36 C.F.R. § 800.4(c) requires that the agency official 1) apply the National Register criteria to<br />
properties identified in the APE, in consultation with the SHPO <strong>and</strong> federally recognized<br />
tribes that may attach religious <strong>and</strong> cultural significance, <strong>and</strong> 2) determine whether a property<br />
is eligible. The criteria, set out in 36 C.F.R. Part 63, are:<br />
The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology,<br />
engineering, <strong>and</strong> culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, <strong>and</strong> objects<br />
that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling,<br />
<strong>and</strong> association <strong>and</strong><br />
(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the<br />
broad patterns of our history; or<br />
(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or<br />
(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of<br />
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic<br />
values, or that represent a significant <strong>and</strong> distinguishable entity whose<br />
components may lack individual distinction; or<br />
(d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory<br />
or history.<br />
National Register Bulletin 38, Guidelines for Evaluating <strong>and</strong> Documenting<br />
Traditional Cultural Properties, provides further instruction on how to apply the<br />
criteria to TCPs. Examples of properties possessing such significance include (among<br />
others) locations where a community or members of a community have traditionally<br />
carried out cultural practices or beliefs important in maintaining their historic identity.<br />
3.6.1.5 Determination of eligibility<br />
FHWA applied the National Register criteria to the properties identified by SRB&A, in<br />
consultation with the SHPO <strong>and</strong> appropriate Native Alaska governments, <strong>and</strong> made the<br />
following determinations.<br />
3.6.1.5.1 The Mat-Su<br />
The field inventory <strong>and</strong> testing program found no historic properties (SRB&A 2006, Vol. I);<br />
therefore, no identified historic properties would be affected by the implementation of any<br />
alternative presented in this Draft EIS.<br />
3.6.1.5.2 Anchorage<br />
SRB&A inventoried all of the 281 properties on Government Hill (SRB&A 2006).<br />
Government Hill had two historic properties, the Brown’s Point Cottages, ANC-0048 <strong>and</strong><br />
ANC-1205, already listed in the National Register. FHWA, 33 in consultation with SHPO, has<br />
determined that there are four historic districts <strong>and</strong> six additional individual properties that<br />
are eligible for the National Register <strong>and</strong> therefore meet the criteria for protection under<br />
33 Personal communication, Edrie Vinson, letter to Judith Bittner, June 23, 2006 (see Appendix D).<br />
12/18/07 3-135