3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />
<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
The Mat-Su’s average property tax rate, based on 27 service areas, is 11.483 mills. The<br />
Borough does not have a sales tax, but it collects a 5 percent tax on accommodations. The<br />
Mat-Su collected $55.5 million in local property taxes in 2004. Additional revenues were<br />
collected from oil <strong>and</strong> gas properties, which make up a small portion of the Borough’s<br />
property base.<br />
L<strong>and</strong> values in the Mat-Su have steadily increased over the last decade, causing property tax<br />
payments to increase. The mill rate has been decreasing, but not enough to offset increasing<br />
real estate values. To provide property owners in the Mat-Su some tax relief, the Mat-Su<br />
Borough Assembly approved a tax cap ordinance in August 2005 that mirrors the Anchorage<br />
tax cap described below. The tax cap does not apply to taxes on new construction or property<br />
improvements made during the current fiscal year; taxes required to fund additional services<br />
m<strong>and</strong>ated by voter-approved ballot issues; special taxes authorized by voter-approved ballot<br />
issues; taxes required to fund the costs of judgments entered against the Borough or to pay<br />
principal or interest on bonds, including revenue bonds; <strong>and</strong> additional taxes collected in<br />
service areas under mill rates specifically approved by service-area residents.<br />
The Borough’s tax cap will go into effect with the 2007 Borough budget, which will be<br />
adopted in May 2006. After a 2-year period, the tax cap can be revoked by the Assembly or<br />
repealed by voter initiative.<br />
Fiscal year 2005 operating expenditures for the Borough are allocated to Borough operations<br />
($45.4 million), enterprise funds ($4.5 million), education operations ($148.9 million), <strong>and</strong><br />
general operations ($7.4 million).<br />
The Borough’s capital improvement budget in FY 2005 consists of about $6.98 million.<br />
Selected budget items include: area-wide road program ($1.2 million), fire service areas<br />
capital projects ($1.1 million), road service area capital projects ($1.8 million), <strong>and</strong> solid<br />
waste capital projects ($450,000).<br />
Port MacKenzie’s FY 2006 budget includes projected revenues of $2.494 million <strong>and</strong><br />
expenditures of $2.493 million (MSB 2005e). As of this writing, the budget for the port is<br />
break-even, but it is anticipated that with port growth, funding will become available for<br />
further port development.<br />
3.2.3.2.2 Palmer revenue sources <strong>and</strong> major expenditure categories<br />
The City of Palmer’s FY 2005 budget is based on total revenues of about $6.4 million. Sales<br />
taxes are responsible for a little more than half ($3.8 million) of the budgeted revenues.<br />
Palmer levies a 2.557 mill tax on properties located inside its boundary. It also charges a<br />
3 percent sales tax. Total property tax revenues for Palmer were $622,879 in 2004. During<br />
the 1998–2004 period, collections grew from $378,000 to nearly $623,000.<br />
Palmer’s expenditures for FY 2005 are $6 million. The Police ($2.5 million) <strong>and</strong> Public<br />
Works Departments ($1.3 million) are the two largest expenditure items, accounting for a<br />
12/18/07 Page 3-67