23.03.2014 Views

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />

<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />

The Mat-Su’s average property tax rate, based on 27 service areas, is 11.483 mills. The<br />

Borough does not have a sales tax, but it collects a 5 percent tax on accommodations. The<br />

Mat-Su collected $55.5 million in local property taxes in 2004. Additional revenues were<br />

collected from oil <strong>and</strong> gas properties, which make up a small portion of the Borough’s<br />

property base.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> values in the Mat-Su have steadily increased over the last decade, causing property tax<br />

payments to increase. The mill rate has been decreasing, but not enough to offset increasing<br />

real estate values. To provide property owners in the Mat-Su some tax relief, the Mat-Su<br />

Borough Assembly approved a tax cap ordinance in August 2005 that mirrors the Anchorage<br />

tax cap described below. The tax cap does not apply to taxes on new construction or property<br />

improvements made during the current fiscal year; taxes required to fund additional services<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ated by voter-approved ballot issues; special taxes authorized by voter-approved ballot<br />

issues; taxes required to fund the costs of judgments entered against the Borough or to pay<br />

principal or interest on bonds, including revenue bonds; <strong>and</strong> additional taxes collected in<br />

service areas under mill rates specifically approved by service-area residents.<br />

The Borough’s tax cap will go into effect with the 2007 Borough budget, which will be<br />

adopted in May 2006. After a 2-year period, the tax cap can be revoked by the Assembly or<br />

repealed by voter initiative.<br />

Fiscal year 2005 operating expenditures for the Borough are allocated to Borough operations<br />

($45.4 million), enterprise funds ($4.5 million), education operations ($148.9 million), <strong>and</strong><br />

general operations ($7.4 million).<br />

The Borough’s capital improvement budget in FY 2005 consists of about $6.98 million.<br />

Selected budget items include: area-wide road program ($1.2 million), fire service areas<br />

capital projects ($1.1 million), road service area capital projects ($1.8 million), <strong>and</strong> solid<br />

waste capital projects ($450,000).<br />

Port MacKenzie’s FY 2006 budget includes projected revenues of $2.494 million <strong>and</strong><br />

expenditures of $2.493 million (MSB 2005e). As of this writing, the budget for the port is<br />

break-even, but it is anticipated that with port growth, funding will become available for<br />

further port development.<br />

3.2.3.2.2 Palmer revenue sources <strong>and</strong> major expenditure categories<br />

The City of Palmer’s FY 2005 budget is based on total revenues of about $6.4 million. Sales<br />

taxes are responsible for a little more than half ($3.8 million) of the budgeted revenues.<br />

Palmer levies a 2.557 mill tax on properties located inside its boundary. It also charges a<br />

3 percent sales tax. Total property tax revenues for Palmer were $622,879 in 2004. During<br />

the 1998–2004 period, collections grew from $378,000 to nearly $623,000.<br />

Palmer’s expenditures for FY 2005 are $6 million. The Police ($2.5 million) <strong>and</strong> Public<br />

Works Departments ($1.3 million) are the two largest expenditure items, accounting for a<br />

12/18/07 Page 3-67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!