3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />
<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
eastern terminus of the proposed project; <strong>and</strong> the Point MacKenzie census-designated place<br />
(CDP) in the southern part of the Mat-Su, at the western terminus of the proposed project.<br />
As discussed above, the Mat-Su is such a large jurisdiction that smaller regions were<br />
designated for this Study. Most of the effects of the proposed project on the pattern of l<strong>and</strong><br />
use, population density, <strong>and</strong> growth rate in the Mat-Su would be expected to occur in these<br />
portions of the borough. The regions include all of the Mat-Su south of Willow on the Parks<br />
Highway east to Sutton on the Glenn Highway, including the Point MacKenzie CDP <strong>and</strong> an<br />
unincorporated area between Palmer <strong>and</strong> Wasilla that has particularly high rates of<br />
population growth <strong>and</strong> development <strong>and</strong> is often referred to as the Core Area.<br />
A third level of detail includes the two broad jurisdictions affected by the proposed project—<br />
Anchorage <strong>and</strong> the Mat-Su. The socioeconomic data are presented at this level because of<br />
data availability issues <strong>and</strong> because it is likely that many of the indirect <strong>and</strong> cumulative<br />
effects of the proposed project would be experienced at this level. In many of the tables, data<br />
are also provided for the three incorporated areas located in the Mat-Su: the cities of<br />
Houston, Palmer, <strong>and</strong> Wasilla. A more detailed overview of the components of the affected<br />
area is provided in the sections below. The general boundaries of the affected area for the<br />
socioeconomic analysis are shown in Figure 3.1, which also illustrates the location of the<br />
regions, the Point MacKenzie area, the Anchorage Bowl Planning Areas, Elmendorf, Fort<br />
Richardson, <strong>and</strong> towns in the Study Area. A full discussion of the selection of the Study Area<br />
for l<strong>and</strong> use is in the L<strong>and</strong> Use <strong>and</strong> Transportation Forecasting Technical Report<br />
(KABATA 2006b). Transportation modeling incorporated in the analysis also included<br />
reasonably foreseeable actions outside the Study Area, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use <strong>and</strong> population modeling<br />
included the area where increased growth is projected to occur with implementation of the<br />
build alternatives.<br />
3.1.1 L<strong>and</strong> Use <strong>and</strong> Ownership<br />
The KAC Study Area is within Anchorage <strong>and</strong> the Mat-Su. Although Anchorage covers an<br />
area of 1,961 square miles including Chugach State Park, <strong>and</strong> the Mat-Su covers an area of<br />
24,683 square miles, the regional Study Area of cumulative <strong>and</strong> indirect effects <strong>and</strong>,<br />
therefore, the Study Area, is confined to those portions of Anchorage <strong>and</strong> the Mat-Su that<br />
would reasonably be affected, directly <strong>and</strong> indirectly, by implementation of the KAC project.<br />
The Mat-Su <strong>and</strong> Anchorage portions of the Study Area—83 <strong>and</strong> 77 square miles,<br />
respectively—are relatively small in comparison with the overall size of each jurisdiction.<br />
3.1.1.1 The <strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing project <strong>and</strong> federal, state, <strong>and</strong> local government<br />
planning regulations<br />
Within the KAC Study Area there are many different levels of government with varying<br />
transportation responsibilities, levels of planning authority, <strong>and</strong> regulations. This section<br />
discusses:<br />
• federal regulations regarding transportation planning in Anchorage, a Metropolitan<br />
Planning Organization (MPO), <strong>and</strong> in relationship to the proposed KAC project<br />
12/18/07 Page 3-3