3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />
<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
Finance Corporation 2005). In the third quarter of 2005, the average house price in<br />
Anchorage was $264,300, as compared with $220,272 in the Mat-Su. The major reason<br />
for this pricing difference is lower l<strong>and</strong> costs in the Mat-Su because of the greater<br />
availability of l<strong>and</strong> for housing development.<br />
The number of housing units increased in both the Mat-Su <strong>and</strong> Anchorage between 1990<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2000. 3 However, both the growth rate <strong>and</strong> the total number of housing units added during<br />
the period were greater in the Mat-Su than in Anchorage (Table 3-5). The rapid growth in the<br />
Mat-Su reflects the relative availability of larger parcels of l<strong>and</strong> for residential development<br />
<strong>and</strong> lower costs of purchasing l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> constructing a new home.<br />
Table 3-5. Number of housing units in the affected area, 1990 <strong>and</strong> 2000<br />
Anchorage<br />
Mat-Su<br />
Category 1990 2000 1990 2000<br />
Total housing units (number) 94,153 100,368 20,953 27,329<br />
Annual change — 0.64% — 2.69%<br />
Vacant units (number) 11,451 5,546 7,559 6,773<br />
Single-family unit portion 52.1% 57.2% 79.6% 82.5%<br />
Vacancy rate 12.1% 5.5% 36.1% 24.8%<br />
Median housing value $139,703 $160,700 $116,072 $125,800<br />
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005<br />
Both Anchorage <strong>and</strong> the Mat-Su have vibrant <strong>and</strong> thriving housing markets. These markets<br />
are, however, experiencing important changes. For example:<br />
• For years, Anchorage has seen more housing starts than the Mat-Su, but in 2004 the<br />
number of housing starts in the Mat-Su surpassed the number of starts in Anchorage for<br />
the first time. 4 For the past several years more multifamily housing has been developed in<br />
Anchorage than single-family housing. 5 In the Mat-Su, single-family home development<br />
is likely to remain the dominant housing product, but the number of multifamily homes is<br />
also expected to grow substantially. 6<br />
• Sales prices in Anchorage are increasing more slowly than in the Mat-Su. The average<br />
sales price for Anchorage homes increased by 2.7 percent annually between 1992<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2004, while the average sales price for Mat-Su homes increased by 3.6 percent<br />
(Alaska Multiple Listing Service, Inc. 2005).<br />
3 The U.S. Census Bureau defines a housing unit as a house, apartment, mobile home or trailer, or a group of<br />
rooms or a single room occupied as a separate living quarters.<br />
4 Personal communication, Kreiger, Alaska Department of Labor <strong>and</strong> Workforce Development, Research <strong>and</strong><br />
Analysis Section. Lender’s survey data requested by Northern Economics, Inc.<br />
5 Personal communication, Vicki Portwood, Anchorage Homebuilders Association, with Northern Economics,<br />
Inc., May 24, 2005<br />
6 Personal communication, P. Palmer, Property Specialist, Prudential Vista of Anchorage, with Northern<br />
Economics, Inc., May 26, 2005<br />
12/18/07 Page 3-15