3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
3.0 Affected Environment - Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing DraftFinal EIS<br />
<strong>Affected</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
• plan for future development of the port district <strong>and</strong> wise utilization of its coastal<br />
resources<br />
The Point MacKenzie AMSA Plan identifies as one of its 12 issues, “providing access<br />
between Point MacKenzie <strong>and</strong> the Anchorage area.” To address this issue, the plan set forth<br />
Goal 2.5: “Develop a direct transportation connection between Point MacKenzie <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Anchorage urban area as the need arises.”<br />
The plan goes on to state that “The <strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> Crossing proposal … could in the future be<br />
very important to the future growth <strong>and</strong> development of the Point MacKenzie area by<br />
improving access to the heavily populated areas across Cook Inlet.” Applicable enforceable<br />
policies are listed <strong>and</strong> discussed in Section 4.8.6.<br />
3.8.6.3 Anchorage<br />
3.8.6.3.1 Anchorage Coastal Management Plan<br />
The Municipality of Anchorage approved its first Coastal Management Plan in 1980 <strong>and</strong><br />
subsequently updated the plan in 1982, with the addition of the Anchorage Wetl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
Management Plan. In 1987, the Anchorage CMP was revised with additional maps but no<br />
substantive changes to the policies or st<strong>and</strong>ards (MOA 1987). The Municipality is currently<br />
revising its CMP to comply with the 2003 ACMA amendments <strong>and</strong> 2004 ACMP regulatory<br />
changes. A revised CMP is scheduled for release in March 2006. For this Draft EIS, the 1987<br />
enforceable policies will be used. Applicable enforceable policies are listed <strong>and</strong> discussed in<br />
Section 4.8.6.<br />
3.8.7 Habitats<br />
3.8.7.1 Marine habitat<br />
3.8.7.1.1 Intertidal zone<br />
The most prevalent intertidal habitat types within <strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> are mud <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> flats, which<br />
usually begin at the mid- to lower intertidal zone. 41 From Eagle Bay <strong>and</strong> Goose Bay<br />
southwest, intertidal substrates vary above elevations of about +4 to +6 feet MLLW. In<br />
general, the middle <strong>and</strong> upper beaches north of the POA, on the southern shore, <strong>and</strong> north of<br />
Point MacKenzie, on the northern shore, consist of gravel <strong>and</strong> cobble mixes with occasional<br />
b<strong>and</strong>s of s<strong>and</strong> at the high tide line <strong>and</strong> more widespread silt/clay deposits in the middle<br />
intertidal range. The extreme conditions of tide, currents, icing, <strong>and</strong> beach instability result in<br />
a very low primary productivity on the beaches <strong>and</strong> in the water column (e.g., Bakus et<br />
al. 1979; FHWA <strong>and</strong> ADOT&PF 1983a).<br />
Field observations completed for this project indicate that intertidal habitat <strong>and</strong> vegetation of<br />
the upper beach on the east side of <strong>Knik</strong> <strong>Arm</strong> consist of gravel <strong>and</strong> cobble with scattered<br />
larger boulders (KABATA 2005b). The middle beach is composed of soft or hard clay, while<br />
the lower beach often has large boulders <strong>and</strong> a broad <strong>and</strong> irregular gravel, boulder, <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong><br />
41 In general, the intertidal zone is the area between highest observed tide <strong>and</strong> lowest observed tide.<br />
12/18/07 3-185