07.04.2014 Views

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:20 PM Page 97<br />

areas, for example south of Long Barrow Crossroads, and<br />

on Rox Hill (RCHM 1979, xiv). Ridge and furrow cultivation<br />

is also visible on aerial photographs of the land east of<br />

King Barrow Ridge (RCHM 1979, plate 9). Mapping the<br />

former extent of this distinctive phase of land-use would<br />

provide a useful perspective on monument survival as well<br />

as an insight into the medieval economy.<br />

Late first-millennium BC and early first-millennium AD<br />

environmental evidence from Boscombe Down West includes<br />

emmer wheat, bread wheat, club wheat, spelt, and barley;<br />

charcoal representing birch, holly, beech, and oak as wood<br />

exploited by the users of the site; and animal bones<br />

representing cattle, horse, sheep/goat, pig, red deer, fox,<br />

raven, and frog (Richardson 1951, 165). Carbonized plant<br />

remains from a grain drier at Butterfield Down (Illustration 75)<br />

confirmed the use of wheat and barley during Roman times<br />

(Allen in Rawlings and Fitzpatrick 1996, 35). Animal remains<br />

from the same site revealed a wide range of wild and domestic<br />

species including cattle, sheep, horse, dog, pig, chicken, red<br />

deer, hare, bird, and amphibian. The cattle bones were heavily<br />

butchered and there was evidence for the use of all body-parts<br />

amongst both sheep and cattle (Egerton in Rawlings and<br />

Fitzpatrick 1996, 35–6). Broadly the same range of animal<br />

species was recorded at Figheldean (Site A: Egerton et al. in<br />

Graham and Newman 1993, 38) and both wheat and barley<br />

were present in samples from the Roman corn drier here too.<br />

The range of wild plants and weeds from the site as a whole<br />

gives an impression of the diversity represented in the Roman<br />

landscape: corn gromwell, campions, orache, goosefoot,<br />

lesser knapweed, medicks, poppies, plantain, knotgrass,<br />

sheep’s sorrel, buttercups, cleavers, eyebright, bartsia, corn<br />

salad, fat hen, chickweed, bindweed, dock, tare, red clover,<br />

mugwort, mayweed, and various grasses and legumes (Ede in<br />

Graham and Newman 1993, 38; Allen in McKinley 1999, 29).<br />

Pasturelands are believed to characterize much of the<br />

Stonehenge Landscape during the post-medieval period from<br />

AD 1500 down to the early twentieth century, although<br />

detailed studies are absent and generalization is therefore<br />

extremely difficult. The higher ground more remote from<br />

settlements along the main river valleys was open grassland;<br />

nearer the settlements there was a higher incidence of<br />

cultivated ground. However, the balance between these uses<br />

shifted according to economic and political circumstances,<br />

with increases in the extent of arable in the early seventeenth<br />

century and again in the mid nineteenth century. A fair<br />

reflection of the situation about 1840–50 is provided by the<br />

Tithe Award maps which show extensive arable along the<br />

Avon Valley in particular (RCHM 1979, Map 3).<br />

The eighteenth century was probably the all-time lowpoint<br />

in the level of woodland cover in the landscape.<br />

Deliberate planting began soon after, and in the nineteenth<br />

century a number of fairly substantial plantations were<br />

added, including Fargo Plantation and Luxenborough<br />

Plantation. In some cases these developed into mature<br />

stands, protecting monuments within them (Illustration 76).<br />

Since the early twentieth century there have been a<br />

number of changes to the environment of the central part of<br />

the Stonehenge Landscape. Intensive military usage until<br />

1950 gave way to a period of agricultural intensification in<br />

the wake of clearing away many of the former military<br />

installations. Following acquisition of the Stonehenge Estate<br />

by the National Trust an ongoing programme of downland<br />

reversion has been pursued, gradually returning arable land<br />

to grazed pasture with consequent opportunities for the reestablishment<br />

of grassland fauna and flora populations.<br />

Cybernetic approaches to early societies<br />

Axiomatic to much processualist analysis of prehistoric and<br />

historic societies is the recognition, modelling, and study of<br />

related themes – technically subsystems of a cultural system<br />

– and the way that through linkages, communications, and<br />

control mechanisms (i.e. cybernetic processes) the content<br />

and articulation of these change through time (Clarke 1968,<br />

101–23; Renfrew 1972, 22 and 486). The number, nature, and<br />

scope of the themes selected depends on the nature of the<br />

inquiry, the exact questions being asked, and the way in<br />

Illustration 75<br />

Romano-British corn drier<br />

found at Butterfield Down,<br />

Amesbury. [Reproduced<br />

courtesy of Salisbury and<br />

South Wiltshire Museum.<br />

Copyright reserved.]<br />

Illustration 76<br />

Woodland clearance at New<br />

King Barrows following the<br />

storms of January 1990.<br />

[Photograph: Timothy<br />

Darvill. Copyright reserved.]<br />

Illustration 77<br />

Cybernetic model of a<br />

dynamic social system<br />

comprising four subsystems,<br />

situated within an<br />

environment, each with a<br />

charted trajectory of change.<br />

[After Clarke 1968, figure 14.]<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!