stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:20 PM Page 97<br />
areas, for example south of Long Barrow Crossroads, and<br />
on Rox Hill (RCHM 1979, xiv). Ridge and furrow cultivation<br />
is also visible on aerial photographs of the land east of<br />
King Barrow Ridge (RCHM 1979, plate 9). Mapping the<br />
former extent of this distinctive phase of land-use would<br />
provide a useful perspective on monument survival as well<br />
as an insight into the medieval economy.<br />
Late first-millennium BC and early first-millennium AD<br />
environmental evidence from Boscombe Down West includes<br />
emmer wheat, bread wheat, club wheat, spelt, and barley;<br />
charcoal representing birch, holly, beech, and oak as wood<br />
exploited by the users of the site; and animal bones<br />
representing cattle, horse, sheep/goat, pig, red deer, fox,<br />
raven, and frog (Richardson 1951, 165). Carbonized plant<br />
remains from a grain drier at Butterfield Down (Illustration 75)<br />
confirmed the use of wheat and barley during Roman times<br />
(Allen in Rawlings and Fitzpatrick 1996, 35). Animal remains<br />
from the same site revealed a wide range of wild and domestic<br />
species including cattle, sheep, horse, dog, pig, chicken, red<br />
deer, hare, bird, and amphibian. The cattle bones were heavily<br />
butchered and there was evidence for the use of all body-parts<br />
amongst both sheep and cattle (Egerton in Rawlings and<br />
Fitzpatrick 1996, 35–6). Broadly the same range of animal<br />
species was recorded at Figheldean (Site A: Egerton et al. in<br />
Graham and Newman 1993, 38) and both wheat and barley<br />
were present in samples from the Roman corn drier here too.<br />
The range of wild plants and weeds from the site as a whole<br />
gives an impression of the diversity represented in the Roman<br />
landscape: corn gromwell, campions, orache, goosefoot,<br />
lesser knapweed, medicks, poppies, plantain, knotgrass,<br />
sheep’s sorrel, buttercups, cleavers, eyebright, bartsia, corn<br />
salad, fat hen, chickweed, bindweed, dock, tare, red clover,<br />
mugwort, mayweed, and various grasses and legumes (Ede in<br />
Graham and Newman 1993, 38; Allen in McKinley 1999, 29).<br />
Pasturelands are believed to characterize much of the<br />
Stonehenge Landscape during the post-medieval period from<br />
AD 1500 down to the early twentieth century, although<br />
detailed studies are absent and generalization is therefore<br />
extremely difficult. The higher ground more remote from<br />
settlements along the main river valleys was open grassland;<br />
nearer the settlements there was a higher incidence of<br />
cultivated ground. However, the balance between these uses<br />
shifted according to economic and political circumstances,<br />
with increases in the extent of arable in the early seventeenth<br />
century and again in the mid nineteenth century. A fair<br />
reflection of the situation about 1840–50 is provided by the<br />
Tithe Award maps which show extensive arable along the<br />
Avon Valley in particular (RCHM 1979, Map 3).<br />
The eighteenth century was probably the all-time lowpoint<br />
in the level of woodland cover in the landscape.<br />
Deliberate planting began soon after, and in the nineteenth<br />
century a number of fairly substantial plantations were<br />
added, including Fargo Plantation and Luxenborough<br />
Plantation. In some cases these developed into mature<br />
stands, protecting monuments within them (Illustration 76).<br />
Since the early twentieth century there have been a<br />
number of changes to the environment of the central part of<br />
the Stonehenge Landscape. Intensive military usage until<br />
1950 gave way to a period of agricultural intensification in<br />
the wake of clearing away many of the former military<br />
installations. Following acquisition of the Stonehenge Estate<br />
by the National Trust an ongoing programme of downland<br />
reversion has been pursued, gradually returning arable land<br />
to grazed pasture with consequent opportunities for the reestablishment<br />
of grassland fauna and flora populations.<br />
Cybernetic approaches to early societies<br />
Axiomatic to much processualist analysis of prehistoric and<br />
historic societies is the recognition, modelling, and study of<br />
related themes – technically subsystems of a cultural system<br />
– and the way that through linkages, communications, and<br />
control mechanisms (i.e. cybernetic processes) the content<br />
and articulation of these change through time (Clarke 1968,<br />
101–23; Renfrew 1972, 22 and 486). The number, nature, and<br />
scope of the themes selected depends on the nature of the<br />
inquiry, the exact questions being asked, and the way in<br />
Illustration 75<br />
Romano-British corn drier<br />
found at Butterfield Down,<br />
Amesbury. [Reproduced<br />
courtesy of Salisbury and<br />
South Wiltshire Museum.<br />
Copyright reserved.]<br />
Illustration 76<br />
Woodland clearance at New<br />
King Barrows following the<br />
storms of January 1990.<br />
[Photograph: Timothy<br />
Darvill. Copyright reserved.]<br />
Illustration 77<br />
Cybernetic model of a<br />
dynamic social system<br />
comprising four subsystems,<br />
situated within an<br />
environment, each with a<br />
charted trajectory of change.<br />
[After Clarke 1968, figure 14.]<br />
97