07.04.2014 Views

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:18 PM Page 47<br />

played a part in ongoing activity, as for example the<br />

Stonehenge Cursus with its evidence for later Neolithic<br />

flintworking well down in the ditch fill (Saville 1978, 17).<br />

Others, for example the Lesser Cursus and perhaps Robin<br />

Hood’s Ball, seem to have fallen out of use, their gradually<br />

eroding earthworks trapping archaeological material thereby<br />

providing a record of the process of abandonment.<br />

The creation of new monuments in the later Neolithic is<br />

amply demonstrated at Stonehenge itself; both the overall<br />

sequence and the problems surrounding its robustness<br />

have been extensively published (Cleal et al. 1995). The<br />

main elements that can be assigned to the third millennium<br />

BC are as follows (Illustration 29):<br />

Phase 1, a circular earthwork monument, constructed<br />

around 2950–2900 BC, comprised a ditch with an internal<br />

bank defining an area about 90m across. Immediately inside<br />

the bank was a ring of 56 equally spaced holes (the socalled<br />

Aubrey Holes) some of which probably contained<br />

upright posts. Outside the ditch was a small counterscarp<br />

bank. There were at least three entrances. Deposits of<br />

animal bones were placed on the bottom of the ditch in<br />

some areas, with particular emphasis on the entrances. An<br />

organic dark layer formed over the primary silting of the<br />

ditch (Cleal et al. 1995, 63). It may be noted that the<br />

construction of the Phase 1 enclosure at Stonehenge is<br />

broadly contemporary with the construction of the bank and<br />

ditch at Avebury (Pitts and Whittle 1992, 205).<br />

Phase 2, 2900–2400 BC, the basic structure remained the<br />

same, but there is evidence for the deliberate back-filling of<br />

parts of the ditch, natural infilling, and some features cut<br />

into the fills. The Aubrey Holes survived as partly filled<br />

features lacking posts by this stage, but timber settings<br />

were constructed in the centre of the monument, at the<br />

northeastern entrance, near the southern entrance, and<br />

outside the earthwork boundary to the northeast. Towards<br />

the end of the phase, cremation burials were deposited in<br />

the Aubrey Holes, in the upper ditch, and around the<br />

circumference of the monument on and just within the bank<br />

(Cleal et al. 1995, 115).<br />

Phase 3i, broadly 2550–2200 BC, the first stone phase<br />

of the monument is built with the erection of a setting of<br />

paired bluestones, the plan of which is far from certain,<br />

Illustration 29<br />

Schematic phase-plans of<br />

Stonehenge 3000–1200 BC.<br />

[After Cleal et al. 1995,<br />

figures 256–7.]<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!