stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:18 PM Page 54<br />
Illustration 33<br />
The Amesbury Archer.<br />
Reconstruction drawing by<br />
Jane Brayne. [Reproduced<br />
courtesy of Jayne Brayne<br />
and Wessex Archaeology.]<br />
isotope studies of the Stonehenge Archer’s teeth suggest that<br />
he spent at least some of his life in or around the Alps,<br />
reopening the possibility of long-distance contacts between<br />
communities living in the Stonehenge Landscape and groups<br />
elsewhere in central and southern Europe. Jackie McKinley’s<br />
study of the skeletal remains suggest that for much of his life<br />
he had been disabled as a result of a traumatic injury to his left<br />
knee which would have caused him to limp. Many of the<br />
artefacts were probably locally made, but the metal used in<br />
one of the copper knives/daggers is Spanish, the gold could<br />
well be continental, and many of the stone objects come from<br />
sources at least 50km distant.<br />
About 5m away from this burial was another, a<br />
companion perhaps, also contained in a rock-cut pit and<br />
perhaps sealed below a ditchless barrow (Fitzpatrick 2003a,<br />
150). This was also a male, younger at about 20–25 years of<br />
age, and perhaps related to the first because they share<br />
minor abnormalities in their foot-bones. Radiocarbon<br />
determinations suggest that this burial is very slightly later<br />
than the first so they could be siblings or father and son.<br />
The younger man’s contained rather fewer grave goods: a<br />
single boar’s tusk and a pair of gold earrings or hair tresses.<br />
Together, these burials raise many questions about the<br />
extended trade networks and long-distance social ties of the<br />
period, as well as emphasizing the need for vigilance in<br />
monitoring development activity throughout the<br />
Stonehenge Landscape.<br />
Further investigations about 700m away in May 2003,<br />
during the course of monitoring the laying of a pipeline at<br />
Boscombe Down, revealed a rather different kind of burial of<br />
the late third millennium BC (Fitzpatrick 2003b; 2004;<br />
Fitzpatrick et al. 2004). Here a large rectangular pit contained<br />
the partly disarticulated remains of three adult males, a<br />
teenage male, and three children, together with eight Beakers,<br />
flint tools, five barbed and tanged flint arrowheads, a boar’s<br />
tusk, and a bone toggle used as a clothes fastener. The burials<br />
had been inserted on several occasions over a period of time.<br />
A man aged between 30 and 45 had been buried on his left<br />
side with his legs tucked up and with his head to the north.<br />
Close to his head were the remains of three children (one<br />
cremated). The teenager, aged about 15–18, and the other two<br />
men, both aged 25–30 at death, were placed around the body<br />
of the older man. Scientific studies of these burials, dubbed<br />
‘The Boscombe Bowmen’, suggest that the teenager and<br />
adults at least were all from the same family and isotope<br />
analysis of samples of tooth enamel suggests that they may<br />
have spent some time in southwest Wales, the area known to<br />
have been the source of stones used in the construction of<br />
Stonehenge Phases 3i to 3v (Fitzpatrick 2004a).<br />
Other burials accompanied by Beaker pottery under<br />
round barrows include: Amesbury G51 and G54 (Annable<br />
and Simpson 1964, 39); Durrington G36 and G67 (Annable<br />
and Simpson 1964, 39–40); Wilsford G1, G2b, and G62<br />
(Annable and Simpson 1964, 40 and 43); Winterbourne<br />
Stoke G10, G43, and G54 (Annable and Simpson 1964, 38<br />
and 40; Ozanne 1972).<br />
Oval barrows were considered in the discussion of fourthmillennium<br />
BC monuments but given that some are undated<br />
and several unexcavated it is probable that some at least of<br />
the examples noted above belong to the third millennium BC.<br />
Wilsford 34, excavated by Thurnam in 1865–6, is interesting in<br />
this connection as he found five contracted burials, one<br />
accompanied by a Beaker pot (Cunnington 1914, 405–6).<br />
Excavated examples elsewhere in southern England suggest<br />
that single inhumations and multi-phase construction should<br />
be expected (Drewett 1986; Bradley 1992).<br />
Flat graves containing inhumation burials associated with<br />
later Neolithic or Beaker pottery are well represented in the<br />
Stonehenge Landscape. These include examples within<br />
monuments such as Stonehenge (Evans 1984), Woodhenge<br />
(Cunnington 1929, 52), and Durrington Walls (Wainwright and<br />
Longworth 1971, 4). Seemingly isolated inhumation burials in<br />
flat graves or pit graves of the same period include those near<br />
Durrington Walls (RCHM 1979, 7), at Larkhill Camp (Short<br />
1946), and at Totterdown Clump (Wainwright and Longworth<br />
1971, 5). It may be noted, however, that many of these lastmentioned<br />
sites were chance discoveries and were mainly<br />
recorded with little attention to establishing context or<br />
associations. The reinvestigation of some sites might yield<br />
valuable information. Some other undated flat graves may<br />
also be related to this period.<br />
Cremation burials of the third millennium BC are also well<br />
represented, and include the group of about 52 deposits/<br />
burials from Stonehenge Phases 1 and 2 (Cleal et al. 1995,<br />
451), the Durrington Down W57 barrow (Richards 1990, 176),<br />
and a pit grave with a cremation and three sherds of Grooved<br />
Ware in Circle 2 south of Woodhenge (Wainwright and<br />
Longworth 1971, 3).<br />
Enclosures of many forms are known to date to the third<br />
millennium BC. In addition to the henges already mentioned in<br />
this section, and the possibility that the Stonehenge Cursus<br />
also dates to the later Neolithic as discussed in the previous<br />
section, there are two other sites in the Stonehenge<br />
Landscape that deserve attention. First is the so-called<br />
‘Palisade Ditch’ or ‘Gate Ditch’ immediately west and north of<br />
Stonehenge, known through relatively small-scale excavations<br />
in 1953, 1967, and 1978 (Cleal et al. 1995, 155–61) and traced<br />
through aerial photography and geophysical survey for a<br />
distance of over 1km (David and Payne 1997, 87). Each of the<br />
excavated sections differs in detail, but most show a V-profile<br />
54