07.04.2014 Views

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

stonehenge - English Heritage

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:17 PM Page 38<br />

There are also hints of finds on the interfluves between<br />

the main rivers in the area: a flint core of ‘tortoise’ type<br />

found southwest of Greenland Farm, Winterbourne Stoke<br />

(Anon 1973; DM 39.1972), and a handaxe from ‘near<br />

Stonehenge’ (WA 1993b, Av3–3). In 1992 a group of three<br />

handaxes and associated worked flint was found on an<br />

upland field situated on a spur on the north side of the<br />

Wylye Valley just outside the Stonehenge Landscape at<br />

Stapleford (Harding 1995).<br />

All of these form part of a much larger body of material<br />

from the Avon Valley and its tributary valleys, itself<br />

connected to the Solent River in antiquity (Wenban-Smith<br />

and Hosfield 2001), and serve to emphasize the great<br />

potential of these deposits in the Stonehenge Landscape<br />

(cf. Roe and Radley 1969, figure 1; Harding and Bridgland<br />

1998; Wymer 1999). Most important is that the valley fill<br />

deposits in the Stonehenge Landscape (Map E) do not<br />

appear to have been extensively quarried, unlike those<br />

lower down the Avon, and they thus represent an<br />

important reserve.<br />

POST-GLACIAL HUNTER­<br />

GATHERERS (12,000–4000 BC)<br />

The late glacial, post-glacial, and early Holocene saw the<br />

transition from tundra environments to an open hazel and<br />

pine Boreal woodland: the Wildwood. Archaeological<br />

evidence for human activity mainly takes the form of<br />

scattered lithic debris and occasional evidence of<br />

constructed features. No sites in the Stonehenge Landscape<br />

have been excavated with the primary aim of investigating<br />

aspects of this period, although relevant material has been<br />

uncovered during salvage operations and the investigation<br />

of later monuments and features. Map F shows the<br />

distribution of findspots and sites relevant to the period<br />

c.12,000 to c.4000 BC.<br />

The extensive surveys of the Stonehenge Environs<br />

Project revealed very little evidence of late Upper<br />

Palaeolithic and Mesolithic activity beyond a light scatter of<br />

microliths. Richards (1990,16) suggests that this may be a<br />

result of inappropriate sampling strategies being applied.<br />

Another possible bias in the picture is caused by coverdeposits<br />

sealing land surfaces of this period. Richards<br />

(1990, 263) cites the results of a sample excavation through<br />

a colluviual bench on the western side of the River Avon<br />

below Durrington Walls which revealed an in situ bladebased<br />

flint industry with microliths. More recently, in 2004,<br />

field evaluations west of Countess Farm carried out in<br />

connection with planning the A303 improvements revealed<br />

a hollow in the bed-rock with associated Mesolithic<br />

flintwork sealed beneath a layer of alluvium/colluvium<br />

(J Keyte pers. comm.). Other similar deposits no doubt await<br />

discovery along the main river valleys.<br />

Early Mesolithic<br />

Nothing that can be ascribed to the late Upper Palaeolithic<br />

either on chronological (c.12,000–c.9000 BC) or on cultural<br />

grounds (Creswellian or Cheddarian flintworking<br />

traditions) has been recognized from the Stonehenge<br />

Landscape to date. The earliest evidence currently<br />

recognized belongs to what is conventionally referred to as<br />

the early Mesolithic, broadly the ninth to seventh millennia<br />

BC, which is often characterized culturally as the period of<br />

the Maglemosian hunters.<br />

No extensive early Mesolithic flint scatters are known<br />

within the Stonehenge Landscape, but, unusually, there is<br />

evidence for constructions of the period. The most securely<br />

dated comprise three substantial postholes and a tree-hole<br />

found during the construction of the Stonehenge car-park<br />

north of the modern A344 in 1966 (Vatcher and Vatcher 1973),<br />

and a pit (known as Pit 9580) found about 100m to the east<br />

during alterations to the visitor centre in 1988–9 (Cleal et al.<br />

1995, 43–7). Charcoal dates posthole A to 8560–8200 BC<br />

(HAR-455: 9130±180 BP), posthole B to 7550–6550 BC (HAR­<br />

456: 8090±180 BP), and the base of the recut secondary fill of<br />

pit 9580 to 8300–7750 BC (GU-5109: 8880±80 BP). The date<br />

of the tree-hole is not known although it is sometimes<br />

assumed to be contemporary and may in fact have been the<br />

focus of this small cluster of features. Their wider context in<br />

terms of potential relationships with areas outside the<br />

investigated trenches is unknown. No artefacts are<br />

associated with any of the features, but they are distinctive in<br />

having an abundance of pine charcoal which Allen (in Cleal et<br />

al. 1995, 52) associates with the Boreal biostratigraphic<br />

subdivision of the Flandrian. The pollen sequence and<br />

mollusca profile from Pit 9580 provide the first evidence for<br />

the character of the Boreal woodland actually within the<br />

chalklands: a birch, pine, hazel mix.<br />

The posts that once filled the postholes in the<br />

Stonehenge car-park are widely interpreted as ‘totem-pole’­<br />

like structures (e.g. Allen in Cleal et al. 1995, 55–6; Allen<br />

1997, 125–6) and as such would represent the first<br />

appearance of monumental features in the landscape. The<br />

possible connection between a tree as a ‘natural’ thing and<br />

an upright post as a ‘cultural’ thing may be relevant, and<br />

perhaps shows that some kind of special significance<br />

attached to the area even at this early date. More than<br />

anything, however, these postholes illustrate the<br />

importance of dating of even the most simple of features.<br />

Potentially contemporary features have been found at<br />

two other sites; more may await recognition through the<br />

review of published excavation reports. Below the<br />

Winterbourne Stoke barrow G30, situated in the western end<br />

of the Stonehenge Cursus, there was an oval hollow about<br />

1.8m by 2.8m in extent. It stratigraphically pre-dates the<br />

barrow and contained only pine charcoal as an indicator of<br />

its age (Christie 1963, 377 and 381). Similarly, a subsoil<br />

hollow beneath the bank at Woodhenge contained abundant<br />

flecks of charcoal and a slightly calcined core-trimming flake<br />

of Mesolithic type associated with a woodland fauna (Evans<br />

and Wainwright 1979, 73, 162, and 192–4).<br />

Stray finds of early Mesolithic types may well exist within<br />

existing assemblages from the area, but have yet to be<br />

recognized. That the Avon Valley was occupied during this<br />

period is, however, well attested by the substantial<br />

settlement known at Castle Meadow, Downton, just outside<br />

the Stonehenge Landscape south of Salisbury. Here structural<br />

evidence in the form of scoops, ‘cooking holes’, and<br />

stakeholes was found, as well as a large flint assemblage<br />

(Higgs 1959). Interestingly, like Stonehenge, Downton also lay<br />

within an area that was later used in the later third and early<br />

second millennia BC (Rahtz and ApSimon 1962).<br />

Late Mesolithic<br />

The late Mesolithic as expressed by conventional culturalhistorical<br />

terminology, broadly the sixth and fifth millennia BC,<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!