stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
stonehenge - English Heritage
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
047-120 section 2.qxd 6/21/05 4:17 PM Page 38<br />
There are also hints of finds on the interfluves between<br />
the main rivers in the area: a flint core of ‘tortoise’ type<br />
found southwest of Greenland Farm, Winterbourne Stoke<br />
(Anon 1973; DM 39.1972), and a handaxe from ‘near<br />
Stonehenge’ (WA 1993b, Av3–3). In 1992 a group of three<br />
handaxes and associated worked flint was found on an<br />
upland field situated on a spur on the north side of the<br />
Wylye Valley just outside the Stonehenge Landscape at<br />
Stapleford (Harding 1995).<br />
All of these form part of a much larger body of material<br />
from the Avon Valley and its tributary valleys, itself<br />
connected to the Solent River in antiquity (Wenban-Smith<br />
and Hosfield 2001), and serve to emphasize the great<br />
potential of these deposits in the Stonehenge Landscape<br />
(cf. Roe and Radley 1969, figure 1; Harding and Bridgland<br />
1998; Wymer 1999). Most important is that the valley fill<br />
deposits in the Stonehenge Landscape (Map E) do not<br />
appear to have been extensively quarried, unlike those<br />
lower down the Avon, and they thus represent an<br />
important reserve.<br />
POST-GLACIAL HUNTER<br />
GATHERERS (12,000–4000 BC)<br />
The late glacial, post-glacial, and early Holocene saw the<br />
transition from tundra environments to an open hazel and<br />
pine Boreal woodland: the Wildwood. Archaeological<br />
evidence for human activity mainly takes the form of<br />
scattered lithic debris and occasional evidence of<br />
constructed features. No sites in the Stonehenge Landscape<br />
have been excavated with the primary aim of investigating<br />
aspects of this period, although relevant material has been<br />
uncovered during salvage operations and the investigation<br />
of later monuments and features. Map F shows the<br />
distribution of findspots and sites relevant to the period<br />
c.12,000 to c.4000 BC.<br />
The extensive surveys of the Stonehenge Environs<br />
Project revealed very little evidence of late Upper<br />
Palaeolithic and Mesolithic activity beyond a light scatter of<br />
microliths. Richards (1990,16) suggests that this may be a<br />
result of inappropriate sampling strategies being applied.<br />
Another possible bias in the picture is caused by coverdeposits<br />
sealing land surfaces of this period. Richards<br />
(1990, 263) cites the results of a sample excavation through<br />
a colluviual bench on the western side of the River Avon<br />
below Durrington Walls which revealed an in situ bladebased<br />
flint industry with microliths. More recently, in 2004,<br />
field evaluations west of Countess Farm carried out in<br />
connection with planning the A303 improvements revealed<br />
a hollow in the bed-rock with associated Mesolithic<br />
flintwork sealed beneath a layer of alluvium/colluvium<br />
(J Keyte pers. comm.). Other similar deposits no doubt await<br />
discovery along the main river valleys.<br />
Early Mesolithic<br />
Nothing that can be ascribed to the late Upper Palaeolithic<br />
either on chronological (c.12,000–c.9000 BC) or on cultural<br />
grounds (Creswellian or Cheddarian flintworking<br />
traditions) has been recognized from the Stonehenge<br />
Landscape to date. The earliest evidence currently<br />
recognized belongs to what is conventionally referred to as<br />
the early Mesolithic, broadly the ninth to seventh millennia<br />
BC, which is often characterized culturally as the period of<br />
the Maglemosian hunters.<br />
No extensive early Mesolithic flint scatters are known<br />
within the Stonehenge Landscape, but, unusually, there is<br />
evidence for constructions of the period. The most securely<br />
dated comprise three substantial postholes and a tree-hole<br />
found during the construction of the Stonehenge car-park<br />
north of the modern A344 in 1966 (Vatcher and Vatcher 1973),<br />
and a pit (known as Pit 9580) found about 100m to the east<br />
during alterations to the visitor centre in 1988–9 (Cleal et al.<br />
1995, 43–7). Charcoal dates posthole A to 8560–8200 BC<br />
(HAR-455: 9130±180 BP), posthole B to 7550–6550 BC (HAR<br />
456: 8090±180 BP), and the base of the recut secondary fill of<br />
pit 9580 to 8300–7750 BC (GU-5109: 8880±80 BP). The date<br />
of the tree-hole is not known although it is sometimes<br />
assumed to be contemporary and may in fact have been the<br />
focus of this small cluster of features. Their wider context in<br />
terms of potential relationships with areas outside the<br />
investigated trenches is unknown. No artefacts are<br />
associated with any of the features, but they are distinctive in<br />
having an abundance of pine charcoal which Allen (in Cleal et<br />
al. 1995, 52) associates with the Boreal biostratigraphic<br />
subdivision of the Flandrian. The pollen sequence and<br />
mollusca profile from Pit 9580 provide the first evidence for<br />
the character of the Boreal woodland actually within the<br />
chalklands: a birch, pine, hazel mix.<br />
The posts that once filled the postholes in the<br />
Stonehenge car-park are widely interpreted as ‘totem-pole’<br />
like structures (e.g. Allen in Cleal et al. 1995, 55–6; Allen<br />
1997, 125–6) and as such would represent the first<br />
appearance of monumental features in the landscape. The<br />
possible connection between a tree as a ‘natural’ thing and<br />
an upright post as a ‘cultural’ thing may be relevant, and<br />
perhaps shows that some kind of special significance<br />
attached to the area even at this early date. More than<br />
anything, however, these postholes illustrate the<br />
importance of dating of even the most simple of features.<br />
Potentially contemporary features have been found at<br />
two other sites; more may await recognition through the<br />
review of published excavation reports. Below the<br />
Winterbourne Stoke barrow G30, situated in the western end<br />
of the Stonehenge Cursus, there was an oval hollow about<br />
1.8m by 2.8m in extent. It stratigraphically pre-dates the<br />
barrow and contained only pine charcoal as an indicator of<br />
its age (Christie 1963, 377 and 381). Similarly, a subsoil<br />
hollow beneath the bank at Woodhenge contained abundant<br />
flecks of charcoal and a slightly calcined core-trimming flake<br />
of Mesolithic type associated with a woodland fauna (Evans<br />
and Wainwright 1979, 73, 162, and 192–4).<br />
Stray finds of early Mesolithic types may well exist within<br />
existing assemblages from the area, but have yet to be<br />
recognized. That the Avon Valley was occupied during this<br />
period is, however, well attested by the substantial<br />
settlement known at Castle Meadow, Downton, just outside<br />
the Stonehenge Landscape south of Salisbury. Here structural<br />
evidence in the form of scoops, ‘cooking holes’, and<br />
stakeholes was found, as well as a large flint assemblage<br />
(Higgs 1959). Interestingly, like Stonehenge, Downton also lay<br />
within an area that was later used in the later third and early<br />
second millennia BC (Rahtz and ApSimon 1962).<br />
Late Mesolithic<br />
The late Mesolithic as expressed by conventional culturalhistorical<br />
terminology, broadly the sixth and fifth millennia BC,<br />
38